
Short-form video is not new. Before TikTookay, there was Vine—a platform that popularized 6-second video clips and helped redefine what it meant to go viral. The “Only a spoonful” of ice cream skit lives rent-free in lots of netizens’ heads. But Vine arrived earlier than cell web and algorithmic feeds totally matured. Though the positioning didn’t stand the check of time, newer platforms constructed on its legacy and additional refined this partaking media format.
Just a few years in the past, simply as TikTookay was exploding in recognition throughout the Western world, issues started to develop over the consequences of endlessly scrolling by its transient, fragmented, and low-context content material, in addition to the cycle of customers reproducing viral tendencies. Out of unease, a subset of netizens began to denounce the media as inflicting “mind rot.” I witnessed the development rapidly escalating from lighthearted mockery to broader political discourse, culminating in discussions about banning the app completely. (Along the best way, we even acquired the “Senator, I’m Singaporean” meme-worthy brief time period.)
Fast ahead to 2025: I walked into my psychiatric ward and heard the in-charge nurse buzzing Yung Kai’s “Blue (Oiia Cat Remix).” Later, at a fast-food joint, I overheard children eagerly reciting the names of Italian brainrot characters like “Tralalero Tralala.” Honestly, these earworms would not let me take pleasure in my cheeseburger in peace.
We can see that short-form movies are extra ubiquitous than ever. While this will likely look like a innocent evolution in leisure, an intuitive concern about their influence on consideration lingers: Watch quick issues, and our consideration span have to be getting shorter, proper? Despite how interesting this concept could seem, and regardless of past public unease, scientific proof on its influence on consideration stays surprisingly restricted.

The survey: Investigating the hyperlink
Attention is likely one of the key parts of college readiness. We centered our analysis on school-age kids (6 to 12 years previous), a vital interval when consideration issues comparable to attention-deficit/hyperactivity dysfunction (ADHD) typically develop into obvious. Yet it is usually a time when the mind stays comparatively plastic, permitting for intervention if aggravating elements are recognized.
We surveyed guardians to evaluate their kids’s use of short-form video media, complete display time, and observable inattentive signs comparable to forgetfulness, distractibility, issue sustaining consideration and making careless errors.
To statistically account for different influences on consideration, we additionally collected information on established elements comparable to beginning problems, sleep disturbances, parenting practices and parental psychological well-being. The study was carried out in suburban Thailand, where skip-generation parenting is widespread attributable to mother and father migrating to city areas for work. The findings are published within the journal Brain and Behavior.
Children in our pattern spent a mean of three.6 hours per day on display media, with 1.9 hours on short-form movies. Such display time is substantial, on condition that Thai schoolchildren usually return residence round 4 p.m. and go to mattress by 9 p.m. This echoes our scientific observations that guardians in our neighborhood (particularly older ones like grandparents) generally enable extreme display time as a result of they “had no concept what else to let the kid do.”
Our evaluation discovered that short-form video use was considerably related to greater inattentive signs, even after accounting for complete display time (which remained an unbiased predictor) and different statistically related elements. Further evaluation revealed that the affiliation was stronger amongst youthful kids.
We additionally examined hyperactive-impulsive and oppositional defiant signs as secondary outcomes, as these clusters of behaviors are carefully associated to inattention. Consistent with present information, complete display time was related to these behaviors. However, short-form video use confirmed no unbiased affiliation, suggesting that in these behavioral domains, general display publicity might play a extra outstanding position.
Understanding the findings and their future implications
Our findings present preliminary proof that short-form video use might exert an unbiased, media-type-specific affect on kids’s consideration. Building on the present state of information on media and cognitive operate, we argue that bidirectional relationships are potential: Pre-existing consideration difficulties might drive better consumption of short-form video, whereas the media use might also contribute to poorer consideration.
In the primary path, kids with consideration difficulties could also be drawn to the traits of short-form movies, probably as a result of their decrease baseline arousal heightens their wants for intense, repetitive and instantly accessible exterior stimuli. In the second path, options of short-form movies—comparable to fast pacing, quick scrolling, and high-arousal content material narrowed down by algorithms—might introduce cognitive overload, government operate depletion, and dysregulation of arousal and emotional programs.
These results may disrupt consideration acutely and, over time, hinder the event of attentional capability. We additionally suspect that extreme short-form video use comes with alternative prices: the displacement of developmentally helpful actions like out of doors play and face-to-face social interactions, which can be one other mechanism explaining the affiliation.
We want to emphasize that our findings are preliminary and shouldn’t be used to justify a witch hunt towards short-video platforms or to impose blanket family bans. Health advisories require substantial scientific proof, which may take time to build up.
For now, we urge mother and father to observe current pointers on media use for kids, preserve open communication with their kids about newer types of media, and keep knowledgeable as extra proof emerges. Screen media use insurance policies at school settings must also align with public suggestions, with applicable changes for developmental stage.
For kids identified with ADHD who exhibit persistent inattention regardless of customary administration (e.g., treatment and research-informed behavioral interventions), a trial discount of short-form video use, and even general media use, could be thought-about as a part of a broader administration plan on a case-by-case foundation.
Our findings of stronger affiliation in youthful kids hinted on the vulnerability of the youthful, maturing brains. Consequently, interventions might have to be extra strongly thought-about and rigorously carried out for youthful age teams.
For tutorial communities, we advocate for additional analysis into the impacts of short-form movies and different rising media codecs, such because the quickly increasing AI-generated content material. Early recognition of potential dangers from rising tendencies will assist evidence-informed policymaking and intervention efforts.
This story is a part of Science X Dialog, where researchers can report findings from their revealed analysis articles. Visit this web page for details about Science X Dialog and take part.
More data:
Romteera Chiencharoenthanakij et al, Short?Form Video Media Use Is Associated With Greater Inattentive Symptoms in Thai School?Age Children: Insights From a Cross?Sectional Survey, Brain and Behavior (2025). DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70656
Dr. Krittisak Anuroj is an assistant professor of psychiatry and a training little one and adolescent psychiatrist at Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand. He carried out this analysis in collaboration with a workforce of medical interns and college students.
Citation:
Short movies, lengthy questions: Is there any hyperlink with kids’s consideration? ( 14)
16
short-videos-link-children-attention.html
The content material is offered for data functions solely.
