European Chemicals Agency claims tattoo ink can increase risk of cancer


  • European Chemicals Agency will publish a list of chemicals in tattoo inks
  • It says ink used in designs is toxic and may increase the risk of cancer 
  • Red inks are the most dangerous, with blue, green and black also risky 

Madlen Davies for MailOnline

113

View
comments

Tattoo inks may raise the risk of cancer and could be banned, a new report has warned.

The craze for tattoos been embraced by celebrities such as Angelina Jolie and David Beckham – and even Samantha Cameron sports a tasteful dolphin butterfly on her ankle.

But now, the body that regulates chemicals across Europe has warned the inks used to create the designs may be toxic.

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) said the inks can cause skin problems including allergic reactions and itching that lasts for years – raising the risk of cancer. 

They may also affect fertility and child development, it said. 

Tattoo inks may raise the risk of cancer and could be banned, according to the European Chemicals Agency. It is believed the craze for tattoos may have been sparked by celebrities such as David Beckham

The ECHA will soon publish a list of chemicals commonly used in tattoo inks – and is exploring whether they should be banned across the EU.

Red tattoo ink was deemed the most dangerous, with blue, green and black also potentially risky.

The agency said: ‘Many reports show concerns for public health stemming from the composition of inks used for tattooing.

‘The most severe concerns are allergies caused by the substances in the inks and possible carcinogenic, mutagenic or reproductive toxic effects.’ 

When a chemical is mutagenic, it means it can change a cell’s DNA, leading to more mutations which may lead to cancer.

The ECHA was asked to review tattoo ink after concerns that despite the fact they are injected into the body, they are not subjects to the same regulations governing drugs and food.

If restrictions are needed, it is likely they will come into practice within a year, the agency said. 

It is estimated that 20 per cent of Britons have tattoos, and one in three young adults.

Red tattoo ink was deemed the most dangerous, with blue, green and black also potentially risky. Pictured are Justin Bieber and the late Amy Winehouse, who both sport tattoos on their arms and elsewhere 

The news comes after study shows more than one in 20 people getting ‘inked’ suffer tattoo-related complications with high rates of infection, itching and swelling.

Researchers at New York University’s Langone Medical Centre found as many as six per cent of adults getting a tattoo experienced some form of related rash, severe itching or swelling that lasted longer than four months and, in some cases, for many years.

They warned treatment is not always successful.

And another study by researchers from Bradford University revealed toxins from tattoo ink could be absorbed into the body and cause cancer.

They believe ink nanoparticles could enter the bloodstream and accumulate in the spleen and kidneys, harming the body’s ability to filter impurities.

Most watched News videos



  • Dramatic moment machete attacker is arrested by German police



  • Spine-chilling moment ghost women trails man into taxi



  • Trump supporter goes on a racist tirade during NY subway ride



  • Strange phenomenon lights up the night sky over Miami



  • Moment ‘machete attacker’ appears to run away following incident



  • ‘You b*****d!’ Crowds shout abuse at attacker in Reutlingen



  • Shocking moment English-speaking man slaps Chinese man round face



  • Moment raccoon loses its rag when homeowner tries to remove it



  • Man films a card skimming device found on an ANZ ATM



  • Racist Trump supporter goes after woman during NYC subway ride



  • Injured man is carried on stretcher following attack in Reutlingen



  • German shepherd joins in with HOWLING wolves from Zootopia


Comments (113)

Share what you think

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Find out now