IVF twin pregnancies riskier than singletons: study



Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:32pm EST


(Reuters) – Having twins as a formula of in vitro fertilization (IVF) carries aloft risks of complications for both mom and babies than carrying dual singular babies from apart IVF procedures, according to a Swedish study.

The additional concerns that come with mixed births are zero new. Btu even as many flood clinics have stopped frequently transferring some-more than one embryo, discuss has continued over either carrying twins by IVF is unequivocally a bad thing for couples unfortunate for children.

“The neonatal and maternal outcomes were dramatically improved for women undergoing dual IVF article pregnancies compared with one IVF twin pregnancy after double-embryo transfer,” wrote lead researcher Antonina Sazonova in a biography Fertility and Sterility.

“These formula support single-embryo send to minimize a risks compared with twin pregnancies,” combined Sazonova of Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden.

The researchers analyzed information from uninformed and solidified bud transfers finished during Swedish IVF clinics between 2002 and 2006. Those annals enclosed 991 women who eventually gave birth to twins after a double bud send and 921 mothers with dual children innate by apart rounds of IVF.

Almost 47 percent of twin babies were innate betimes and 39 percent were deliberate low birth weight, a group reported. That compared to a 7 percent of article babies that were preemies and reduction than 5 percent innate small.

Twins were also some-more expected to have respirating complications, sepsis or jaundice. Their mothers had dual to 3 times some-more preeclampsia – high blood vigour and protein in a urine – and were 4 times some-more expected to need a C-section than women who had dual singular births.

However, there was no disproportion in a babies’ chances of carrying serious malformations and other life-threatening health problems.

“A lot of patients, when they’ve had infertility for a prolonged time, consider that it’s a reward to get two,” pronounced Lynn Westphal, a women’s health and flood dilettante during Stanford University Medical Center in Palo Alto, California.

“We know it’s always safest to have one child during a time,” combined Westphal, who wasn’t concerned in a new study, adding that she and her colleagues have been conversing some-more and some-more women to have a singular bud transferred, generally a younger and healthier patients.

Some information advise women are only as expected to get profound if they have a singular bud transfer, contra some-more than one. But a commentary have been inconsistent, Westphal said.

“A lot of patients are focusing only on removing pregnant, they’re not looking during a whole pregnancy and looking during a outcome of twins,” she said.

“They’re only meditative if they send more, they’re some-more expected to get pregnant. And they’re meditative if they have twins, they’re only removing all finished during one time.”

SOURCE: bit.ly/UcRQQ8

(Reporting from New York by Genevra Pittman during Reuters Health; modifying by Elaine Lies)

Source: Health Medicine Network