Regular eating found to reduce the chance of dying from clogged arteries by 30%


  • Study shows half a dozen meals or snacks daily can slash the risk of dying
  • They reduce risk of dying from clogged arteries by more than 30 per cent
  • That is compared to eating three or four meals a day, according to a study
  • The findings could force a rethink on the three-meals-a-day eating routine

Pat Hagan for the Daily Mail

4

View
comments

A study shows half a dozen meals or snacks daily can slash the risk of dying from clogged arteries by more than 30 per cent, compared to three or four meals a day (file photo)

Doctors spend a great deal of their time these days telling patients to eat less, not more.

But that could all be about to change after researchers discovered eating at least six times a day could be the secret to beating heart disease.

A study shows half a dozen meals or snacks daily can slash the risk of dying from clogged arteries by more than 30 per cent, compared to three or four meals a day.

And, crucially, the dangers appear to subside even if overall daily energy intake exceeds recommended levels of 2,500 calories for men and 2,000 for women.

The findings could force a rethink on eating habits. UK health experts have long advised patients to stick to a regular three-meals-a-day routine of breakfast, lunch and dinner and to minimise snacking on sugary, fatty foods in between.

But the latest study, published in the Annals of Epidemiology, suggests this may be making heart health worse. Scientists behind the research think the body is better able to metabolise small amounts of energy at a time.

Large meals spaced wide apart are more likely to overload the metabolic system, triggering the perfect conditions for type two diabetes and larger fat deposits – key risk factors for heart disease.

Instead, regular nibbling could be good for heart health. 

Researchers, however, warned a six-meals-a-day diet is only good if it is rich in fruit and vegetables and low in junk food. The study by Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore University looked at nearly 7,000 adults, following them up for over 14 years.

The results showed almost 30 per cent sat down to food at least six times a day. At the other extreme, 4 per cent insisted they ate only once or twice daily. 

The frequent-eaters consumed more calories overall during the day, although their average intake at each ‘sitting’ was lower. They also tended to prefer healthier food.

When researchers tracked them for over a decade they found volunteers eating six times a day or more were 32 per cent less likely to die from cardiovascular disease than others on three or four meals daily.

The researchers said: ‘People eating more frequently were less likely to have a large waist circumference or to be obese.’

Dietitian Tracy Parker, of the British Heart Foundation, said: ‘Following a healthy diet, by eating regular and balanced meals that are rich in fruits and vegetables, pulses, wholegrains and fish, can help reduce your risk of developing coronary heart disease.’

Most watched News videos



  • Italian wingsuit pilot broadcasts own death live on Facebook



  • Millionaire releases video of ex fiancee ‘beating herself up’



  • Furious 49ers fans burn Kaepernick jerseys after anthem snub



  • Sickening footage shows ISIS children execute Kurdish fighters



  • US soldier left for dead fights Taliban alone for an hour



  • Moment heroic helicopter pilot saves person stranded on cliff



  • Man finds out his wife is pregnant after his failed vasectomy



  • Muslim women humiliated and ordered to LEAVE French restaurant



  • Police arrest of man dressed as ‘Zorro’ caught on camera at LAX



  • Adorable labrador falls ASLEEP with happiness over toy bone



  • Dispatcher in Chinese take-out murder case causes controversy



  • Priest injured in suspected terror attack at Indonesian church


Comments (4)

Share what you think

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Find out now