Symptom-based screening at US airports for coronavirus is ineffective and found just NINE cases over eight months, CDC report finds
- Between January 17 and September 13, more than 766,000 travelers were screened for coronavirus at 15 US airports
- About 300 people met criteria for additional evaluation and, out of 35 people who were tested for COVID-19, nine received positive results
- Researchers say many cases were missed because many people are asymptomatic or people denied symptoms to screeners
- The program ended on September 14 and the CDC says it is more focused on encouraging travelers to wear masks and get tested before their flights
Symptom- and temperature-based screenings at US airports are ineffective at detecting cases of coronavirus, a new report finds.
Between January 17 and September 13, more than 766,000 travelers were evaluated at 15 airports across the US.
Of that figure, just nine people went on to test positive for COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revealed on Thursday.
The findings suggest ‘most infected travelers [went] undetected by symptom-based screening at airports’ and were then able to unknowingly spread the virus within their communities.
A new CDC report looked at a screening program during which, from January 17 to September 13, more than 766,000 travelers were screened for coronavirus at 15 US airports. Pictured: A traveler is checked with a handheld thermometer at Los Angeles International Airport, June 24
About 300 people met criteria for additional evaluation and, out of 35 people who were tested for COVID-19, nine received positive results
The program began on January 17 when CDC officials began working with the Department of Homeland Security, to screen passengers arriving from Wuhan, China, which was the epicenter of the outbreak at the time.
Screening initially occurred at just Los Angeles International Airport, San Francisco International Airport and John F Kennedy International Airport in New York City.
However, on February 3, the strategy was expanded to included all passengers arriving from mainland China, whom were routed to one of 11 designated airports.
Over the next few weeks, numerous countries were added to the list including Iran, the Uk, Ireland, Brazil and 28 nations in the European Schengen Zone.
By May 28, screening had expanded to 15 airports. The remaining 12 included:
John F Kennedy International Airport screened the most passengers over the eight month period at 146,127, nearly 20 percent of all people who entered the US.
- Trump administration partners with pharmacy chains and… Father-of-two, 52, undergoes life-saving double lung…
Meanwhile, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International screened the least amount at 6,582, only about 0.9 percent of all passengers.
Screening was a three-step process with the first step requiring US Customs and Border Protection to identify passengers who had been in a country that required screening over the last 14 days.
Secondly, health officials would conduct a temperature check and have passengers fill out a questionnaire asking if they experienced symptoms such as coughing or shortness of breath.
Lastly, any flagged travelers were additionally examined by on-site medical officer or referred to a local healthcare facility.
Regardless of symptoms, all passengers were given an information card advising them to stay home or in a hotel room and quarantine for 14 days.
Of 766,044 travelers who were screened only 298 – about 0.04 percent – met CDC criteria for referral.
More than 93 percent were referred because they signs or symptoms while the remaining seven percent had either been in the Hubei Province or had come into a contact with an infected person.
Nearly three-quarters of the people with symptoms reported a cough while the next most common symptom was a self-reported fever.
In total, 35 passengers were tested for coronavirus and nine people received positive results.
This means one in every 85,000 travelers screened were identified by the CDC’s program.
The CDC ended the airport screening program on September 14 and ‘has transitioned to enhancing communication with travelers to promote recommended preventive measures.’
This includes encouraging travelers to wear face covering on airplanes and urging testing pre- and post-travel.
Researchers add that this style of screening may miss many cases due to the high number of asymptomatic patients or passengers denying symptoms.
‘Because…infection and transmission can occur in the absence of symptoms and because the symptoms of COVID-19 are nonspecific, symptom-based screening programs are ineffective for case detection,’ the authors wrote.
Comments 2
Share what you think
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
The comments below have not been moderated.
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Close
Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline?
Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual.
Close
Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline?
Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual
We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on MailOnline. To do this we will link your MailOnline account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook.
You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.
