The Bitter Battle Over Sugar


But sugarine is underneath attack. Best-selling scholarship publisher Gary Taubes asked “Is sugarine toxic?” in a 2011 New York Times Magazine article. NY Times food columnist Mark Bittman recently answered Taubes’ question: “Sugar is indeed toxic.” Last month food and open health activists rigourously called on a FDA to umpire sugarine consumption, job sugarine “…a slow-acting though ruthlessly fit bioweapon (that causes) obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.” Sugar? A bioweapon?

Whence such antipathy for what tastes so good? On a aspect it seems like this is partial of society’s approval that approach too many of us import approach too much. But a misrepresentation of sugarine pre-dates a new fulfilment of a plumpness widespread in America. New York Times scholarship publisher Jane Brody wrote that “sugar has turn a many maligned of a categorical components of a American diet” in 1977. In response (and to save money), in a early 1980s food manufacturers transposed a lot of sucrose (sugar from shaft and beets) with high fructose sugarine from corn. That reduced a bit of a flourishing sourness about sugar, though it didn’t revoke any of a health problems compared with immoderate too many sugarine – dental problems, plumpness and a compared problems of heart disease, atherosclerosis, Type 2 (adult onset) diabetes, and presumably even some kinds of cancer – since biologically, sugar-as-fructose from corn and sugar-as-sucrose from shaft and beets are radically matching in a approach a bodies use them. As Taubes reported;

Luc Tappy, a researcher during a University of Lausanne in Switzerland who is deliberate by biochemists who investigate fructose to be a world’s inaugural management on a subject, pronounced there was “not a singular hint” that high fructose corn syrup was some-more pernicious than other sources of sugar.

But for reasons that have small to do with a health and many some-more to do with a psychology of risk perception, fructose has turn a concentration of this stream food quarrel about sugar. Witness articles like The Not-So-Sweet Truth About High Fructose Corn Syrup,  5 Dangers From High Fructose Corn Syrup, and Metabolic Danger from High Fructose Corn Syrup. That essay warns “Americans are being tainted by a common addition benefaction in a far-reaching array of processed foods… The name of this poisonous addition is high-fructose corn syrup.” Dunh Dunh Duhhhh!

Since too high a sip of possibly fructose or sucrose is bad for us, producing a same health outcomes, since are many of a We Know What’s Good For You Food Police focusing on only one of them? For a clue, check out his picture, now creation a rounds on a amicable net.

 

The idea lies not in what a design shows, though in what’s missing. Where is a orange juice, a grape juice, a apple juice, a cranberry juice, all of that might be some-more healthy though that have as many as, or some-more sum sugarine per section than any of a drinks shown.

Grams of sugarine per 100 grams of beverage

Carbonated cola beverages 10.6

Orange extract 10.2

Apple extract 10.9

Cranberry extract 12.1

Grape extract 14.9

Prune extract 16.45

Source: USDA 

They’re not there since ‘juice’ is natural, and a processed dishes that are on a draft are during slightest in partial human-made. Of course, a extract has been processed too, and all sorts of things have been added, like preservatives, though to a intrinsic risk notice system, a some-more healthy sounding extract feels reduction risky, and a some-more human-made industrial assumed processed dishes feel some-more risky. Just demeanour during some of a denunciation from a pieces that concentration their sugarine anger on fructose;

• In a Huffington Post, Dr. Mark Hyman warns that “High fructose corn syrup is an industrial food product and distant from “natural” or a naturally occurring substance.” “The sugars are extracted by a chemical enzymatic routine ensuing in a chemically and biologically novel devalue called HFCS.”

• In a Life Extension Magazine article, Dr. Dana Flavin starts with “Americans are being tainted by a common addition benefaction in a far-reaching array of processed foods…”

• And here’s what a Center for Science in a Public seductiveness says in their petition to a FDA; “As now formulated, Coke, Pepsi, and other sugar-based drinks are vulnerable for unchanging tellurian consumption.” (Nothing about OJ or Grape Juice.) “The FDA should need a libation attention to re-engineer their sweetened products over several years…” Remember, CSPI called sugarine a ‘bioweapon’. That means they consider a genuine rivalry is a attention that’s adding sugarine to a food, not a sugarine itself.

These critics are focusing their regard not on sugarine broadly, though on a form of sugarine that allows them to conflict their genuine target, a food industry. And this is not only my interpretation. Marion Nestle, a New York University nutritionist, heading censor of a food attention and a author of “Food Politics”, told Taubes that high-fructose corn syrup “has indeed turn a flashpoint for everybody’s dread of processed foods…” (my emphasis) And by distrust of processed foods, Nestle means distrust not of Spam and Velveeta though of a companies that make them.

Mistrust of attention (many industries merit not to be trusted) and larger fear of something human-made than natural, notwithstanding a evidence, are dishonest, and dangerous bases for risk management policy. Too many sugarine is positively bad for us in lots of ways, though that’s loyal of sucrose OR fructose, and process that responds to open vigour on fructose is going to leave us reduction stable from another form of sugarine that, in excess, is only as bad for us. This is only one some-more instance of how a Risk Perception Gap – when we’re some-more fearful of some things than we need to be or reduction fearful of some things than we ought to be – can get us in trouble. So job out a law about a twisted concentration on fructose is offering here in a hopes that government and attention approaches to a dangers of a honeyed tooth can come closer to attack a honeyed symbol of doing us a many good.

Tags:
atherosclerosis, libation industry, bioweapon, cancer, candy, candy girl, core for scholarship in a open interest, coke, dana flavin, dangerous aspect, diabetes, diabetes and heart disease, dr oz, dr. oz, fda, food columnist, fructose, fruit juices, gary taubes, health activists, heart disease, high fructose corn syrup, jane brody, mm’s, marion nestle, symbol bittman, symbol hyman, natural, nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp, obesity, pepsi, preservatives, psychology of risk, risk perception, scholarship journalist, offered science, spam, spoonful of sugar, sugar, sugarine and spice, sugarine consumption, sweet, honeyed heart, honeyed smell of success, usda, velveeta

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • LinkedIn
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr