HMN 2025: What are the perpetrator and victim perspectives on sexualized deepfake abuse

dark keyboard

AI tools are making it easier to create and disseminate deepfake imagery, and a new study from Monash University has revealed insights into the experience of both victims and perpetrators of sexualized deepfake abuse. The research, published in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, is the first of its kind to include interviews with both perpetrators and victims. The goal was to understand patterns in abuse in Australia and motivations, including how people who engage in these harms rationalize and minimize their actions.

The study’s lead author, Professor Asher Flynn from the School of Social Sciences at Monash University and a Chief Investigator on the Australian Research Council Center of Excellence for the Elimination of Violence Against Women (CEVAW), said advances in digital technologies have provided new opportunities for people to engage in harmful sexual behaviors.

“Our findings indicate that creating and sharing sexualized deepfake imagery is not only normalized among some young men, but encouraged as a way to bond or gain status from their peers,” Professor Flynn said. “Many participants frequently pointed to the positive reinforcement from peers about their technological prowess in creating realistic, but fake sexualized images as a key motivation.”

The study also found that perpetrators frequently downplayed the harm caused, with many claiming AI technologies made the images easy to create, shifting the blame away from themselves.

“There is a clear disconnect between participants’ understanding of sexualized deepfake abuse as harmful, and acknowledging their own actions. Many turned to victim-blaming, claiming it was just a joke or outright denial—echoing patterns we see in other forms of sexual violence. This makes it harder to recognize and report sexualized deepfake abuse, which in turn undermines accountability and weakens any deterrent effect.”

Despite the severity of the harm, none of the perpetrators interviewed had faced legal consequences. Victims also reported little to no recourse—even when incidents were reported to police.

While women were often the targets of the abuse, particularly when the motivations were to harm, control or sexualize the subject of the fake image, the study found a pattern of perpetration against men motivated by monetary gain (sextortion), humor and humiliation.

Professor Flynn said tighter regulations of the accessibility of deepfake tools, as well as education around the potential consequences and harms of sexualized deepfake abuse are a necessary starting point to tackle this emerging form of abuse.

“The growing proliferation of AI tools, combined with the acceptance or normalizing the creation of deepfakes more generally, has provided access and motivation to a broader range of people who might not otherwise engage in this type of abuse.”

More information:
Asher Flynn et al, Sexualized Deepfake Abuse: Perpetrator and Victim Perspectives on the Motivations and Forms of Non-Consensually Created and Shared Sexualized Deepfake Imagery, Journal of Interpersonal Violence (2025). DOI: 10.1177/08862605251368834

Provided by
Monash University



The content is provided for information purposes only.