I Almost Forgot a Crystal Skulls.


My brother, (Aaron): “This man materializes tiny pieces of element only by concentrating on a religious icon.”

Me:  “Is that so?”

Aaron (some time later): “I contacted Mom by these 3 opposite mediums.” (Our mom had been passed about 8 years.)

Me:  “No kidding? Shouldn’t that be media, if it’s plural?”

Aaron (some time later): “I have this sketch in a protected deposition box. No one has entrance to this box though me; though each time we demeanour during a picture, there is another figure in a picture. we showed this sketch to a member of a family that had it originally; and they customarily commend a person. It’s customarily an uncle or a cousin.”

Me:  “Really.”

Aaron (some time later): “Twenty thousand people in Brazil saw a drifting saucer.”

I was struck reticent by this bulletin. In a initial place, we did not unequivocally see this as a penetrating event—which was my brother’s specialty. And afterwards we was dreaming from a categorical point—whatever that competence have been—by erratic thoughts: Who was counting all these people? What were they doing before a U.F.O. showed up? Were they singing and dancing? we commend that this was a stupid thought, though all we knew about Brazil was that they favourite to dance there.

One day Aaron told me about a skull. we remember him revelation me It was detected by a daughter of an archeologist; so we assume it was a same skull referred to in a essay above. There can’t be too many immature women erratic around a jungles digging adult clear skulls. This skull—and a other one—had penetrating powers. we do not remember what they were, only that this skull had one conspicuous power. According to Aaron, a skull could envision macroeconomic trends. Since we had other things to consider about behind then—trying to support a family, for instance, on 3 thousand dollars a year—I did not consider twice about this skull’s sold skills. But now we wonder. First of all, we consternation how it was detected that this skull had such a worldly understanding of economics.  After all, a skull was carved—so a story goes– by a Mayans , who knew something about astronomy though not many about  a transformation of vast sums of income opposite inhabitant boundaries. For one thing, they had no inhabitant boundaries. These are a issues that strike me now:

For functions of meditative about it, let’s extend that this skull had penetrating powers. That would meant that a Mayans, who knew so small of a universe that there are no Mayans left, though knew how to soak a pile of potion with powers different to a universe today. You can see a meditative behind this idea. Mayans=ancient civilization=arcane knowledge. Also skull-shaped object=something spooky=mysterious powers. But, then—

  1. How accurately does one promulgate with an unfeeling object? Does it light adult in a dim when it wants to contend something?  Does it use a suggestion beam like a ones passed people use in séances? Does some gifted chairman glance during a skull and announce to everybody else what a skull is thinking? (I find myself once again dreaming here by erratic thoughts. we can see loyal by a skull. It has no brains. It is a rather amateurishly forged square of glass. Does that make it  hard for a skull to consider truly wise thoughts? Probably not. we have spin too asocial listening to my hermit tell tales from a crypt.)
  2. Assume for a consequence of evidence that we have devised a approach to promulgate with a clear skull. Assume, for a consequence of argument, that a skull is inhabited by a correct spirit, as against to many of a articulate heads we listen to on wire television. What do we wish to ask a skull first? Surely we would wish to learn answers to a simple questions:

“Is George going to be dismissed from his job?”

“Does Shirley unequivocally adore me?”

“How can we get my son to stay divided from Marijuana?”

“Is this mole going to spin into cancer?”

Or a Big questions:

“What is a definition of life?”

“Does God exist? Which God is best?”

“Does adore unequivocally order a world?”

  1. If a clear skull answered any/all of these questions, it would not be regarded as a dilettante in economics. It would be regarded as an all-around expert, like many psychics. That means these questions were ot answered properly. That means that after not responding a simple questions, and not responding a Big questions, a questioner (truth-seeker?) had to keep seeking some-more and some-more questions until he finally came to an area, economics, where a clear skulll was on a ball—so to speak. we courtesy this as not credible. The questioner would have had to work his approach by a dozen subjects—politics, pediatrics, cooking, agriculture, etc.—before removing to economics. If a skull showed no special imagination in any of these fields, a questioner would have given adult his enquiries prolonged before finally removing to economics. And, if we know my hermit correctly, a skull was not even consultant in all of economics, though only in macroeconomics. Imagine that conversation:

“Tell me, skull, do we have an opinion about a aptitude of sum domestic product to a sell rate? Or vice-versa?” Or, “Do we consider E.T.F,s  are a good investment during a time of world-wide rising unemployment?”  (At a time of that we am speaking, there were no sell traded funds, so this review is wholly imaginary.)

Actually, we can’t suppose this conversation. we know that if we were articulate to a clear skull and it done a ridiculous response, (or, presumably no response during all) we would no longer survey it. Certainly, it would not start to me to ask it about macroeconomic trends.

 

I consider it is probable that my hermit done a whole thing up.

 

On a other hand, it is loyal that this archeologist from Belize is suing Indiana Jones and his friends for dismissal of a clear skull from South America—where it never was.  Apparently.

 

I don’t know what happened to a other Crystal Skull, a attractive one. we like to consider that wherever it is, it is regulating the measureless visionary powers to do good. (c) Fredric Neuman  Follow Dr. Neuman’s blog during fredricneumanmd.com/blog.

 

 

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • LinkedIn
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr