
A major global review has revealed critical gaps in how heart attacks in women are diagnosed and treated—particularly for premenopausal women. The American Heart Association (AHA) today released a new scientific statement led by Australian cardiologist Professor Jason Kovacic, warning current clinical practices may be costing women their lives. The statement is published in the journal Circulation.
Despite heart disease being the leading cause of death overall and the second in Australia, experts reveal premenopausal women (typically women aged under about 50) who experience acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including heart attacks, can be misdiagnosed or undertreated because they don’t fit the traditional risk profile. Studies show these women face significantly worse outcomes, including a higher likelihood of death or complications, compared to men of the same age.
Professor Kovacic, director and CEO of the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute said, “Too many women are missing out on timely diagnosis and treatment for heart attacks because the system isn’t designed to properly recognize these patients. We need urgent action to close these gaps.”
The AHA statement outlines several key priorities to close these critical care gaps:
- Increased awareness of how heart attacks can present in women
- More representation of women in research and clinical trials to address poor outcomes.
- Faster, more accurate diagnosis for premenopausal women
Current clinical guidelines are typically lacking in detail related to the various causes of heart attacks in premenopausal women, particularly non-atherosclerotic causes. This refers to cases that aren’t driven by the usual risk factors such as high cholesterol, high blood pressure, or fatty plaque buildup, which can lead to missed or delayed diagnosis and suboptimal care pathways.
Two key examples are:
Although these conditions are recognized as major contributors to heart attacks in younger women, they remain under-represented in existing clinical guidance—in part due to a lack of scientific evidence as to how best to manage these conditions. As a result, and because they are somewhat less common conditions, women are less likely to receive an accurate diagnosis and therapy after presenting with ACS, contributing to poorer outcomes compared with men the same age.
“We often see heart attacks in premenopausal women that don’t look like the classic picture doctors expect. We need better recognition and more clinical research focused on women to ensure these different presentations are understood and incorporated into guidelines, so that every woman gets the correct diagnosis and optimal treatment,” said Professor Kovacic.
Delays in care can often stem from low recognition of women’s heart attack symptoms both by women themselves and in emergency settings. While chest pain is the most common sign, women may experience subtler symptoms such as jaw or back pain, nausea, sweating, fatigue, or simply feeling “not right.” These atypical signs are easily missed at home and during triage, making greater symptom awareness and improved emergency pathways critical to closing care gaps.
The statement also calls for stronger follow-up care to address common secondary risk factors as well as issues linked to pregnancy. It recommends cardiac rehabilitation programs as these are proven to help recovery and improve long-term health. The statement also highlights mental health support, particularly for depression and anxiety after a heart attack, as an essential part of care.
“This AHA scientific statement is an urgent call to action to drive further research and to address the poorer outcomes that are often seen in these young women. We know the gaps, and now we need to close them. Heart disease does not have an age limit, and premenopausal women deserve the same urgency and quality of care as any other patient with a suspected heart attack,” said Professor Kovacic.
Publication details
Jason C. Kovacic et al, Acute Coronary Syndromes in Premenopausal Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, Circulation (2026). DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001416
Journal information:
Circulation
The content is provided for information purposes only.
