Now the WHO sensationally turns on China over hiding of Covid data


China‘s lack of transparency over Covid’s origin is ‘simply inexcusable’, the World Health Organization sensationally claimed today.

Beijing-affiliated researchers have only just publicly shared crucial samples taken from inside Wuhan‘s ‘ground zero’ — three years after the pandemic began.

In a rare, blistering attack on Xi Jinping‘s communist regime, a senior WHO official fumed that this data ‘should have been shared immediately’.

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO’s technical lead on Covid, also admitted that she thinks China could be sitting on even more bombshell evidence that could finally solve the mystery surrounding the pandemic’s origin.

This could include, she hinted, details into risky experiments being carried out inside the secretive facility central to the ‘lab leak’ theory.

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO's technical lead on Covid, also admitted that she thinks China could be sitting on even more bombshell evidence that could finally solve the mystery surrounding the pandemic's origin Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO's technical lead on Covid, also admitted that she thinks China could be sitting on even more bombshell evidence that could finally solve the mystery surrounding the pandemic's origin

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO’s technical lead on Covid, also admitted that she thinks China could be sitting on even more bombshell evidence that could finally solve the mystery surrounding the pandemic’s origin

But other Covid origin theories point to animals kept at Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan (pictured) as being the epicentre of the outbreak. Many of the earliest cases in December 2019 and January 2020 had visited the site, where live animals were sold But other Covid origin theories point to animals kept at Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan (pictured) as being the epicentre of the outbreak. Many of the earliest cases in December 2019 and January 2020 had visited the site, where live animals were sold

Studies point to Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan (pictured) as being the epicentre of the outbreak. Many of the earliest cases in December 2019 and January 2020 had visited the site, where live animals were sold

Ever since the pandemic began, the Huanan Seafood Market had been held up as the source of the pandemic as the earliest cases were linked to the market. Pictured: Workers in protective gear catch a giant salamander that was reported to have escaped from the Huanan Seafood Market in January 2020 Ever since the pandemic began, the Huanan Seafood Market had been held up as the source of the pandemic as the earliest cases were linked to the market. Pictured: Workers in protective gear catch a giant salamander that was reported to have escaped from the Huanan Seafood Market in January 2020

Ever since the pandemic began, the Huanan Seafood Market had been held up as the source of the pandemic as the earliest cases were linked to the market. Pictured: Workers in protective gear catch a giant salamander that was reported to have escaped from the Huanan Seafood Market in January 2020

China has repeatedly dismissed accusations that the virus could have leaked – whether by accident or on purpose – out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yet researchers probing Covid’s source accept it is entirely plausible.

Many scientists back the natural origins theory, believing that the virus originated in bats and infected an intermediary species — possibly a pangolin — before then infecting humans.

Yet that theory was seemingly dealt a huge blow yesterday by an eagerly-awaited paper authored by academics at China’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

It ruled there was no proof to definitively say SARS-CoV-2 jumped from exotic animals sold at the Huanan Seafood Market, where many of the earliest known patients had visited before getting ill.

Instead, the team cautioned that humans could have brought the Covid-causing virus to the site, which then acted as a super-spreader in December 2019.

Their explosive paper, published in the respected journal Nature, analysed hundreds of samples taken from around the market itself and wild animals sold there shortly after the outbreak was detected.

Some say it's possible the coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (pictured), where researchers were conducting controversial research on the world's most dangerous pathogens Some say it's possible the coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (pictured), where researchers were conducting controversial research on the world's most dangerous pathogens

Some say it’s possible the coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (pictured), where researchers were conducting controversial research on the world’s most dangerous pathogens

Top virologists have begged for such data for years, arguing it could provide a trove of clues that pinpoint the source of the pandemic.

Yet the WHO only became aware such samples existed three weeks ago.

The UN agency was alerted to the cache by experts who had stumbled across the samples by chance on a repository site and controversially concluded that raccoon dogs sold at the market could be the origin.

US magazine The Atlantic, which was leaked the research, billed it as the ‘strongest evidence yet that an animal started the pandemic’. Yet it was heavily criticised, including by the same Chinese team.

Addressing the delay in sharing the samples, epidemiologist Dr Van Kerkhove said: ‘The lack of data disclosure is simply inexcusable.

READ MORE Is this more proof that Beijing hid COVID truth from the world? Doctors believe German man had illness in December 2019 – days BEFORE China raised the alarm 

Do these CT scans of 71-year-old German man's lungs taken on December 30 2019 prove Covid was spreading in the country one month before the first official case? Do these CT scans of 71-year-old German man's lungs taken on December 30 2019 prove Covid was spreading in the country one month before the first official case?

Do these CT scans of 71-year-old German man’s lungs taken on December 30 2019 prove Covid was spreading in the country one month before the first official case?

‘The longer it takes to understand the origins of the pandemic, the harder it becomes to answer the question, and the more unsafe the world becomes.’

She added: ‘Every new piece of data could potentially move the world closer to stopping another pandemic – perhaps a worse one – in the future.

‘The failure to share information only fuels politicization of origins tracing and keeps all hypotheses viable.’

Writing a first-person piece in the prestigious journal Science, Dr Van Kerkhove said: ‘China has advanced technical capabilities and I therefore believe that more data exist that have yet to be shared.’

This includes ‘on the wild and farmed animal trade; the testing of humans and animals in Wuhan and across China; the operations of labs in Wuhan working on coronaviruses; the earliest potential cases; and more’, she added.

‘WHO continues to call on China and all countries to share any data on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, immediately.

‘The world needs to move away from the politics of blame and, instead, exploit all diplomatic and scientific approaches so that the global scientific community can do what it does best – collaborate, focus on this health crisis, and find evidence-based solutions to thwart future pandemics.

‘Time is running out.’

The WHO has repeatedly come under fire during the pandemic for its stalwart defence of China.

This included parroting Beijing’s dismissal that the virus could have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate. Some studies point to a natural spillover at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbour Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bottom right) The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate. Some studies point to a natural spillover at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbour Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bottom right)

The question of whether the global outbreak began with a spillover from wildlife sold at the market or leaked out of the Wuhan lab just eight miles across the Yangtze River has given rise to fierce debate about how to prevent the next pandemic. New studies point to a natural spillover at the Huanan wildlife market. Positive swab samples of floors, cages and counters also track the virus back to stalls in the southwestern corner of the market (bottom left), where animals with the potential to harbour Covid were sold for meat or fur at the time (bottom right)

While China has insisted the virus originated elsewhere, academics, politicians and the media have contemplated the possibility it leaked from a high-level biochemical lab in Wuhan - raising suspicions that Chinese officials simply hid evidence of the early spread While China has insisted the virus originated elsewhere, academics, politicians and the media have contemplated the possibility it leaked from a high-level biochemical lab in Wuhan - raising suspicions that Chinese officials simply hid evidence of the early spread

While China has insisted the virus originated elsewhere, academics, politicians and the media have contemplated the possibility it leaked from a high-level biochemical lab in Wuhan – raising suspicions that Chinese officials simply hid evidence of the early spread

In the earliest days of the outbreak, WHO director Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus even went as far as to praise Beijing’s ‘commitment to transparency’ which he called ‘beyond words’.

At around the same time, the Communist Party began censoring public information about the spread of the virus and its potential origins, at one point suggesting that US troops could have been the initial carriers.

Yet, despite being accused of being too cosy with Xi’s regime, the WHO has started voicing public frustration at China for its lack of transparency in recent months.

An initial investigation by the WHO in 2021, which saw a group of scientists travel to China, concluded that Covid emerged naturally.

It was criticised due to a lack of cooperation from Beijing, which allegedly refused to discuss the lab leak theory unless the final report stated no further investigation was needed, and withheld key data and samples.

DID COVID LEAK FROM A WUHAN LAB? THE EVIDENCE FOR AND AGAINST 

Evidence for Wuhan lab-leak theory

An article in the respected Science journal on May 14 2021 kick-started the surge in interest for the lab-leak theory.

Some 18 experts wrote in the journal that ‘we must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data’.

Later that month, a study by British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr Birger Sørensen claimed it had ‘prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China’ for a year.

The study included accusations of ‘deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data’ at Chinese labs.

It followed statements from the WHO Director General, US and EU that greater clarity about the origins of this pandemic is necessary and feasible to achieve.

Previously, the theory had been dismissed as conspiracy by most experts, partly because of its association with President Donald Trump.

President Joe Biden in May 2021 ordered a full investigation into the origin of the pandemic virus and demanded scientists work out whether there is truth to the theory.

In December 2021, Harvard scientist Dr Alina Chan told the UK’s Science and Technology Select Committee that it is ‘reasonable’ to believe that Covid was genetically engineered in China. 

She also said that the Chinese Communist Party’s cover-up of the initial outbreak in Wuhan two years ago and attempts to sabotage the World Health Organisation’s inquiry into the origins of the pandemic made the lab-leak theory likely. 

The head of the World Health Organization insisted just a day earlier that the theory that Covid emerged from a Wuhan lab has not been ruled out — as he said China should help solve the mystery out of ‘respect’ for the dead.

The body’s director-general, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, suggested that Beijing had not cooperated fully as he urged more ‘transparency’ in the continuing investigation.

And a senior Government source claimed in June 2022 that the WHO boss privately believes the pandemic kicked off following a leak from a Chinese lab. 

In September 2022, leading medical journal the Lancet admitted the virus may have been leaked from a lab, including those in the US. 

Evidence against the theory

Most of the scientific community say the virus is most likely of natural origin.

A series of papers point to the virus evolving in animals before being transmitted to humans, in the same way as all other previously discovered coronaviruses.

The first study, published in Scientific Reports, showed some 47,000 wild animals from 38 species were sold across four markets in Wuhan between May 2017 and November 2019.

The authors, including Dr Chris Newman, an evolutionary ecologist at Oxford University, claimed the evidence showed the conditions for animal-to-human transmission were in place in Wuhan.

But they acknowledged there was no proof Sars-CoV-2 was present or originated in any of these animals.

A joint World Health Organization-China investigation also concluded it was ‘very likely’ the virus jumped from bats to humans via an as-yet-unknown intermediary animal.

And a June 2022 report by the WHO sets out that Covid most likely originated in bats before infecting humans.