IVF clinics are pushing women to buy needless treatments
- They can cost between £100 and £3,500 on top of a standard course of IVF
- Oxford Uni research exposed how 26 out of 27 treatments were ineffective
- Experts said most had ‘no benefit whatsoever’ and falsely raisied women’s hopes
Sophie Borland Health Editor For The Daily Mail
8
View
comments
Women desperate to have children are being put under pressure to pay for additional IVF treatment, the fertility watchdog warns today.
Sally Cheshire, chairman of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, admits she has no powers to prevent unscrupulous clinics selling these procedures.
Such add-ons include screening to select the best embryos, procedures to help them implant into the womb and drugs to prevent a woman’s body rejecting them.
They can cost between £100 and £3,500 on top of a standard course of IVF, which is £4,000.
Women desperate to have children are being put under pressure by unscrupulous clinics to pay for additional IVF treatment
But Oxford University research, shown on the BBC’s Panorama programme in November, exposed how 26 out of 27 treatments were ineffective. Experts said most had ‘no benefit whatsoever’ and were falsely raising women’s hopes.
Sally Cheshire, chairman of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, admits she has no powers to stop the unscrupulous clinics
Addressing a fertility conference in Central London today, Mrs Cheshire will warn of a recent ‘step change’ in the promotion of ‘add ons’ by clinics.
Addressing a fertility conference in Central London today, Mrs Cheshire will warn of a recent ‘step change’ in the promotion of ‘add ons’ by clinics.
She will say: ‘An increasing number of patients tell us they feel unsure about IVF treatment add-ons, whether they work and are worth the extra cost.
‘This puts pressure on patients to make difficult decisions at what is already a stressful time for them. We are concerned about the recent step change in the use of treatment add-ons, but unfortunately have limited powers to stop clinics offering them, nor to control pricing.’
Professor Adam Balen, chairman of the British Fertility Society, will also warn of the ‘confusion’ surrounding add-ons.
-
Groundbreaking new procedure will allow female cancer…
‘Infertile’ women conceive despite early menopause: Blood…
At the conference, hosted by the Progress Educational Trust, he will say: ‘It is important to define what is meant by an add-on, as there has been a lot of confusion and many so-called add-ons are in reality part of standard treatments.
‘The treatment of infertility has evolved in the UK without adequate funding for research and innovation, so the big question is: when should new treatments be introduced into clinical practice, and how should they be paid for?’
The treatments can cost between £100 and £3,500 on top of a standard course of IVF, which costs £4,000
One of the most controversial add-ons is ‘preimplantation genetic screening’ – which costs up to £3,500 – whereby embryos are checked for abnormalities.
But a trial in 2007 found that early forms of this technique could actually harm the embryo and reduce the chances of giving birth. Although most clinics now offer more accurate versions of the screening, there is no clear evidence it boosts success rates.
Last week an eminent fertility doctor warned that add-ons were being promoted to women who were too old for IVF to work.
Professor Hans Evers, of Maastricht University in the Netherlands, said clinics should stop offering treatment to patients over the age of 42 as the success rate was only 5 per cent.
He also warned that many centres were promoting ‘nonsense’ add-ons to these women ‘which don’t help’.
Share or comment on this article
- Horrifying moment villagers cut open a giant python and…
- Thrown to his death then pelted with rocks by barbaric…
- ‘Get the dog off me’: Neighbours heard chilling screams…
- Renovation Ivanka: How the First Daughter and Jared have…
- Sturgeon throws down the gauntlet: Scottish Parliament…
- ‘It is time for Britain to come together’: May’s rallying…
- From model to meth addict to model again: America’s next…
- I’m very thirssssty! Angry king cobra is given water from…
- Hostess with the mostess! Melania dons $2,390 LBD as she…
- EXCLUSIVE: ‘Are they going to be alright?’ Stunned…
- £70,000 Ferrari left to rot on a street near Harrods for…
- Caught on secret camera: Sickening moment a sneaky carer…
- ISIS ‘cubs of the caliphate’ hunt down prisoners before…
- White women criticized for wearing hoop earrings because…
- Baby girl maimed with a hammer in her home ‘has been left…
- Five medics are fired after footage of them dancing…
- Places where HALF the GPs are failing: Best and worst…
- Diamonds aren’t a girl’s best friend: Jewelry restorer…
Comments 8
Share what you think
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
The comments below have not been moderated.
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Close
Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual.
Your comment will be credited to your MailOnline persona.
Close
Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual
We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on MailOnline. To do this we will link your MailOnline account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook.
The post will be credited to your MailOnline username. You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.