New 3D printing method could transform recycling material behind medical isotope

Enriched molybdenum, from which Mo-99 can be made, is expensive, costing about $1,000 per gram. Commercial producers lacked an easy, cost-effective way to recycle the enriched material — until now. (Note that Mo-99 decays into technetium-99m, which radiologists then use to develop the actual pharmaceuticals used in medical procedures.)

For the first time in the U.S., Argonne scientists have scaled up the recycling of isotopically enriched molybdenum, Mo-98 or 100, to engineering scale using new 3D printed parts. This new approach makes the laboratory’s recycling method — pioneered in 2015 by Mo-99 program manager Peter Tkac and others — faster, more reliable and more cost effective.

Unlocking the benefits of 3D printing

When Tkac and colleagues first discovered how to recycle enriched molybdenum, the process proved tedious. The team converted the used enriched molybdenum, along with other chemicals, to an acidic solution. They then purified the enriched molybdenum in multiple stages using funnels and test tubes.

“Our original method would have been very difficult to automate,” said Tkac.

A year later, Tkac began working with Peter Kozak and others to automate the process, which relies on corrosive chemicals. The team replaced funnels and test tubes with 3D-printed acrylic contactors, which spin and separate chemicals using centrifugal force. The researchers said these contactors are what make recycling enriched molybdenum cheaper and more efficient.

“We printed each contactor as one piece with streamlined features and fewer external connections,” said Kozak. “This allows us to push the liquid through the system as quickly and reliably as possible.”

The new process effectively separated the enriched molybdenum from potassium and other contaminants, as described in a December 26 article in the Journal of Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange.

Yet, a problem arose. The hydrochloric acid corroded the 3D-printed plastic after about 15 hours of operation.

“Our experiment was successful,” said Kozak. “But if you want to move into full production, you need material that will survive a lot longer than that.”

Looking for PEEK performance

Kozak and Tkac soon found a more durable material called polyether ether ketone (PEEK). PEEK is a better choice because it resists the recycling method’s mineral acids and many organic solvents.

But PEEK material, the team found, also shrinks as is it printed, causing the material to warp. To compensate, Kozak tweaked the printer’s fan speed and temperature, which helped him print PEEK materials that are stronger and more flexible than the original acrylic plastic. With PEEK material, the team found the best of both worlds: efficient, quick, and cost-effective recycling of enriched molybdenum that is strong enough to hold up against the chemicals that separate molybdenum from other materials.