America’s chubby babies on the decline: Figures show first drop in overweight infants since 2000
- Rate of children at risk of obesity fell from 15% to 12% between 2010 and 2014
- Babies are now the least likely of youngsters to be chubby, the CDC reports
- Investigators were surprised by the results given rising rates over past 10 years
Associated Press
7
View
comments
A decline in chubby babies and toddlers is providing a glimmer of good news in the nation’s fight against obesity.
The trend was found in a study of children up to age two enrolled in a government nutrition assistance program for low-income women and children. Half of all U.S. infants up to 12 months old are enrolled in the program.
The rate of youngsters at risk for obesity fell during the study, from almost 15 percent in 2010 to 12 percent overall in 2014, researchers from the federal Centers of Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the journal Pediatrics.
The rate declined in all ages studied.
It was lowest — about 8 percent in 2014 — for the youngest infants, from three to five months, versus almost 15 percent among toddlers.
Babies are now the least likely of youngsters to be chubby, the CDC reports
The results were unexpected, given rising rates earlier in the decade, said CDC researcher David Freedman, the lead author.
‘People are thrilled,’ he said.
Freedman said reasons are uncertain for the decline, but it came amid changes designed to improve nutrition and health in food packages, including more whole grains, fruits and vegetables.
Also, breastfeeding among participating women increased in 2009 and that can protect against obesity.
The results echo a reported decline in older children in the program, referred to as WIC for women, infants and children.
Also previous CDC data showed a similar decline in all U.S. youngsters from two to five years old, from about 14 percent in 2004 to 9 percent in 2014, coinciding with national campaigns targeting childhood obesity.
Obesity rates tend to be higher in children from low-income families including WIC participants.
-
Could a bite from a FLY land you in hospital? A friend of…
Girl, 12, dies just four weeks after she was sent home from…
Dr. David Ludwig, director of obesity prevention at Boston Children’s Hospital, called the results encouraging but said, ‘It’s too soon to tell whether these new data represent a statistical fluke or evidence of real progress with the pediatric obesity epidemic. ‘
The researchers analyzed WIC survey data from 2000 to 2014 involving almost 17 million infants and young children. Rates increased early on, then remained stable from 2004 to 2010 until the decline.
Doctors don’t usually describe babies as obese, but measure their risk using a weight-for-length ratio. Those with a high ratio, generally heavier than 95 percent of their peers, face an increased chance of becoming obese later on.
Whether the decline has continued is uncertain and the study didn’t track infants to see if they became overweight or obese later on.
According to the CDC, U.S. obesity rates total almost 18 percent among all 6- to 11-year-olds and nearly 21 percent among 12- to 19-year-olds
Share or comment on this article
-
e-mail
-
Kanye West-wing: The Donald embraces his troubled ‘friend’…
-
Terminally-ill boy, five, dies in Santa Claus’ arms after…
-
Trump’s Iran stance could threaten a WORLD WAR and the…
-
Democrats’ all-out bid to smear Trump’s victory as Clinton…
-
EXCLUSIVE: Angelina demands Brad Pitt be drug tested four…
-
It’s not ‘he’ and ‘she’. It’s ‘ze’: Oxford University union…
-
Bride paralyzed at her bachelorette party opens up about sex…
-
Shocking moment a woman was physically dragged off a Delta…
-
Best Buy employees in Long Island chip in to buy a $300 WiiU…
-
Woman left with huge bill after Plenty of Fish date eats…
-
The Laughing Cavalier was a true gent and the two figures…
-
Missing North Carolina girl who was last seen aged 15…
Comments (7)
Share what you think
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
The comments below have not been moderated.
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Find out now