Give pregnant women routine test for deadly bug
- Offering screening for Group B Strep leads to an 83 per cent drop in newborns developing it
- As many as one in five pregnant women carry the bacteria which is often not harmful to babies
- An inquest into Pippa Griffiths’s death found she would have survived had the bug been detected sooner
Sophie Borland Health Editor For The Daily Mail
13
View
comments
Pregnant women should be routinely tested for a deadly infection to protect their unborn babies, researchers claim today.
A study found that offering screening for the Group B Strep (GBS) bug led to an 83 per cent drop in numbers of newborns developing it.
As many as one in five pregnant women carry the bacteria and most of the time it doesn’t cause any harm to their babies.
But it can lead to blood poisoning, meningitis or pneumonia and in some cases death.
Hayley Matthews, 29, of Chirbury, Stirchley, Telford, who lost her baby, Jack Burn, right, at just one day old to Strep B at the Princess Royal Hospital
Only last week an inquest into the death of baby Pippa Griffiths who contracted the bug heard she would have survived had staff detected it sooner.
She was born at home but midwives at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital in Shropshire failed to visit afterwards nor offer her mother, Kayleigh, any advice.
Although pregnant women are routinely screened for the bacteria in the US, Canada, France and Slovenia, the NHS claims the tests are not sufficiently effective.
This study looked at 6,000 pregnant women at the North West London Healthcare trust who were offered the test over a 22 month period.
-
Mother’s stillbirth agony as NHS blunder meant she wasn’t…
Marine vet suffers a stroke at his wife’s hospital bedside…
The findings published in the BMJ Open showed that babies born to mothers who were screened were 83 per cent less likely to develop the infection.
Dr Gopal Rao, consultant microbiologist at Northwick Park Hospital, who led the study, said: ‘Our hospital’s rate of Group B Strep infection was much higher than the national average, despite carefully following national guidelines.
The orange pigment of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B). Testing pregnant women for it can result in much lower rates of infant death
‘I looked at international evidence showing how well screening worked overseas, and wondered if it could work as well in the UK.
‘Our pilot study has demonstrated that not only is screening doable in a UK setting, it had an even greater effect than we had expected.
‘We are delighted with our findings, and hope comparable results can be seen across the UK.’
Symptoms of GBS in babies include being floppy and unresponsive, not feeding well, grunting, having a high or low temperature, and fast or slow breathing or heart rate.
In March, Public Health England told BBC Radio 5 live Investigates that the number of babies being made ill by GBS has increased by 12% between 2011 and 2015.
Figures for 2014/15 show that 518 newborn babies in the UK and Ireland were made ill as a result of the bacteria and 27 died.
Jane Plumb, chief executive of Group B Strep Support, said: ‘These findings raise questions about the validity of the UK National Screening Committee’s recommendations last month against introducing routine screening of pregnant women for Group B Strep.
‘These results were not included in the review, and the UK NSC should re-examine their recommendation in light of this new evidence.’
Dr Anne Mackie, director of programmes for the UK National Screening Committee, said: ‘At the moment there is no test that can distinguish between women whose babies would be affected by GBS at birth and those who would not.
‘This means that screening for GBS in pregnancy would lead to many thousands of women receiving antibiotics in labour when there is no benefit for them or their babies and the harms this may cause are unknown.’
?#?w?TUT
Share or comment on this article
- Revealed: Disgraced Patriots star Aaron Hernandez may…
- The sad life of Shayanna Jenkins: Widowed without being…
- Aaron Hernandez ‘wrote bible verse John 3:16 on his…
- North Korea wipes out US city with massive nuclear…
- ‘Will my kids be OK?’ Touching moment Prince William…
- ‘We part ways due to completely unfounded claims’:…
- Factory worker sticks a 1.6ft long eel into his anus…
- The spectacular rise and fall of Aaron Hernandez: How a…
- Inside the ghost town in North Korean built by South…
- Mother-of-four, 36, killed herself after she lost custody…
- Theresa May warns Britain about a ‘coalition of chaos’…
- Bottoms up! ‘The Flying Bum’ – the world’s biggest…
- Surgeon who cut off four-year-old’s penis while carrying…
- Italy’s ‘orgy island’ where Marquis would hold wild…
- NFL stars and Snoop Dogg slammed by fans for their…
- That’s not what we meant by love-all! Crunch tennis match…
- Enormous iceberg 50ft taller than the one that sank the…
- Theresa May hints at mass clearout of Cameron’s legacy:…
Comments 13
Share what you think
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
The comments below have not been moderated.
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Close
Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual.
Your comment will be credited to your MailOnline persona.
Close
Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual
We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on MailOnline. To do this we will link your MailOnline account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook.
The post will be credited to your MailOnline username. You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.