Hordes of people wasting NHS resources for allergy tests
- Nearly 12 per cent of adults in the UK elect themselves for expensive NHS tests
- Researchers found that only 1 per cent of them actually have an allergy
- Instead, a questionnaire could identify allergy risk with 90 per cent accuracy
James Draper For Mailonline
8
View
comments
Millions of people are undergoing pointless allergy tests on the NHS, experts claim.
Roughly 12 per cent of the adult population believe they have a food aversion – when, in reality, only 1 to 2 per cent actually do.
The discovery was made after researchers analysed patient blood tests against a simple questionnaire on symptoms and supposed triggers.
The latter, although only comprising of four questions, offered a 90 per cent accuracy in detection and could subsequently help save the NHS huge sums.
Scroll down for video
You’re fine! Roughly 12 per cent of the adult population believe they have a food aversion – when, in reality, only 1 to 2 per cent actually do
Currently, thousands of patients demand GP appointments over fashionable food intolerance, which add to the rising NHS cost.
But the new research, which was published in the British Journal of General Practice on Tuesday, offers a more cost-effective way of detecting issues.
The study was made of 143 people and off-set the data of their finger-prick tests with four core questions.
-
‘My £43,000 stem cell therapy in Mexico has transformed me’:…
Angelina Jolie eats bugs – and you should too: Why…
Yes, there IS such a thing as healthy pancakes: We reveal 7…
Is one of these nasties lurking in YOUR body?…
These included: Do you have, or have you ever had, hayfever? Do any of your parents or siblings have, or have they ever had, hayfever? Do your allergy symptoms vary when you go from place to place (for example, on holiday)? and Is there a specific trigger that always sets off your allergy symptoms?
The authors concluded that, for those who answered no to the four questions, they most had no allergy.
Pre-emptive: Asking key questions could be more cost-effective than finger-prick tests
‘Most (87.5%) of those who gave negative responses to all the questions were non-atopic (had negative skin tests),’ the researchers said.
They added that ‘a significant number of people mistakenly believe they have allergies and use both NHS and their own time and resources pursuing unnecessary investigations’.
They also added that the findings may help family GPs work out the risk of allergy, although they said larger studies should be carried out.
Share or comment on this article
-
e-mail
- What just happened?! The stunned faces of Matt Damon, The…
- White couple weep as judge gives them 28 years in prison…
- Russian teenagers committing suicide ‘as part of bizarre…
- The bean-counter who blundered: Cornell-educated…
- Tara Palmer-Tomkinson’s sister shares eulogy from the…
- Make yourself at home, Kellyanne! White House adviser is…
- So how often should you clean the toilet, wash your…
- ‘She’s getting sacked in the morning’: Jubilant teachers…
- Brie Larson jets out of LA after refusing to clap for…
- Something’s sizzling! Incredibly boring video of a woman…
- EXCLUSIVE: Oscars sensation ‘Gary from Chicago’ served 22…
- ‘If you’ve never got a bit frisky in public then ya…
- Can giving families a £26,000 lump sum get them off…
- Couple who claim to be ALLERGIC to living in a modern…
- Central Park carriage horse collapses in the street after…
- Europe’s first brothel where customers pay £100 an hour…
- Father, 58, was so furious he paid £125,000 in school…
- ‘An historic mistake’: Sir John Major slams Brexit as he…
Comments 8
Share what you think
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
The comments below have not been moderated.
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Close
Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual
Your comment will be credited to your MailOnline persona
Close
Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual
Your comment will be credited to your MailOnline persona