Why ‘Canada’s reprieve from pharmaceutical budget pressures is over’

The growth in health spending in Canada is slow overall but public spending on prescription drugs increased, according to two new reports.

The Canadian Institute for Health Information’s (CIHI) overview of health expenditures from 1975 to 2016 showed the rate of growth of total health expenditure this year is expected to be 2.7 per cent.

In comparison, public drug program spending increased 9.2 per cent from 2014 to 2015.

  • Get ready to pay more for private drug plans
  • Canada needs ‘defined model’ of universal pharmacare, citizen panel urges

Hospitals, (29.5 per cent), drugs (16.0 per cent) and physician services (15.3 per cent) accounted for more than 60 per cent of total health spending in 2014, the latest available data.

Growth in drug spending has slowed as patents have expired on blockbuster medications such as cholesterol-lowering statins. Public drug programs have also worked to limit prices for generic drugs.

“Although these changes have led to significant savings for public drug programs, the savings were offset by increased spending on specialized medications, such as biologics and antivirals (e.g. those used to treat hepatitis C); this is putting significant pressure on both public and private drug programs,” the authors of the health expenditure trends report wrote.

Almost two-thirds of the growth in 2015 was attributed to the introduction of new drugs used to treat hepatitis C.

A biologic drug class known as tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (anti-TNF drugs), used to treat conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease, accounted for the highest proportion (8.2 per cent) of public drug program spending.

The pharmaceutical report offers a partial snapshot of drug expenditures since it focuses on the minority of pharmaceutical costs that are financed by governments in Canada, said Steve Morgan, who teaches health policy at the University of British Columbia and has written widely on pharmaceutical coverage.

Combined with data on overall drug spending, the report “adds evidence to suggest Canada’s reprieve from pharmaceutical budget pressures is over,” Morgan said, referring to the slowing in spending in the 1990s and early 2000s when generic competition increased.

“High-cost medicines now coming to market are placing much bigger pressures on governments and, to be clear, on patients, businesses, and unions who finance non-government spending in this sector,” Morgan said.

“The pressures on the private system not depicted in this report are critical for businesses who face an increasingly heavy burden of high drug costs without having the tools necessary to appropriately manage and equitably finance those costs. In Canada’s otherwise universal, public health care system, only government has that capacity. That question is, will government step up to the challenge?”

The reports come as federal, provincial and territorial finance and health ministers prepare to meet Monday to discuss a potential new health accord.