Author Katherine Bouton Opens Up About Going Deaf

Copyright © 2013 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, before accede required.


As a journalist, I’ve famous Katherine Bouton for over 30 years. we initial met her on a outing to Antarctica in 1979. A famous design of me interviewing penguins was taken by Ms. Bouton. But we was never entirely wakeful of a border of a private conflict she has been fighting, an invisible condition that affects 50 million Americans, I’m articulate about conference loss.

If we consider conference detriment is something customarily comparison people have to worry about, we competence be astounded to find out, as we was after reading her book, that 50 million people humour from some grade of conference impairment, and it can occur during any age. Ms. Bouton went deaf during a age of 30. Today she has assistance from a cochlear impact and conference aids, yet it’s still a struggle.

In her new book she describes how she schooled to cope with conference detriment and since we need to do some-more to residence this widespread yet misunderstood problem. Katherine Bouton is author of “Shouting Won’t Help: Why we – and 50 Million Other Americans – Can’t Hear You.” It’s going to be on bookshelves subsequent week on Feb 19. She joins us here in a New York studio. And if I’m vocalization some-more clearly currently than normal, it’s since Katherine Bouton can’t hear me, and she is mostly lip-reading. Is that correct?

KATHERINE BOUTON: we am partly lip-reading, yet we have a good voice for me.

FLATOW: That’s good.

BOUTON: Your voice is during a magnitude spin that is one of my improved ones.

FLATOW: Finally, something good with my voice.


FLATOW: But we don’t call it lip-reading anymore, do you?

BOUTON: You’re ostensible to call it speech-reading.

FLATOW: Because?

BOUTON: we consider – we don’t know since a conference contention wants that. But, in fact, it is reading not customarily a lips, yet physique language, facial expression, so speech-reading is some-more accurate.

FLATOW: Our series is 1-800-989-8255 if you’d like to pronounce to Katherine Bouton. And if she can’t hear what you’re saying, I’ll send a doubt from my reader here.

This is a unequivocally engaging story. You detected when we were 30. What – tell us what happened in that…

BOUTON: Well, we was sitting during my desk, writing. we don’t remember what we was writing. we consider we was essay a square for The New Yorker that was published before we went to Antarctica with you. And my phone rang. we could hear a phone, and we picked it up. we always used to collect adult a phone with my left palm and put it to my left ear so that we could take records with my right, and we couldn’t hear anything.

And we said, hello? Hello? Hello? Is anybody there? And afterwards we switched to my other ear, and somebody said, yes, I’m perplexing to strech Katherine Bouton. So that was alarming. But afterwards after we hung adult on that call, that we listened to with my right ear, we finished several other calls. In those days we could call a weather, and we could call time. And so we finished several calls to see presumably we can hear out of both ears, and we couldn’t hear out of my left ear.

I wasn’t primarily that dumbfounded since I, like all children of a ’60s and ’70s, had left to my share of stone concerts and had mislaid my conference temporarily before, and we suspicion maybe this was a proxy loss.

FLATOW: Mm-hmm. And afterwards it widespread to your other ear.

BOUTON: It didn’t widespread to my other ear for a integrate of decades. we spent many of my 30s and 40s conference with one ear, conference with my right ear, and we did flattering good with my right ear. Around a time we incited 50 – my conference detriment was progressive, so a left ear was going down, down, down, down. And around a time we incited 50, a left ear was so distant down and a right ear was so fundamentally nonfunctioning that we finally gave in and got conference aids, that we should have finished long, long, prolonged before that.

FLATOW: Mm-hmm. You pronounce about so many things in your book. Is there a executive summary we wish to give people about conference loss?

BOUTON: Yes. There are a integrate of messages we wish to give people. One is that if we humour from conference loss, don’t humour alone. There are a lot of people out there like you. we spent a good series of years not acknowledging my conference loss. we cut off a lot of my friendships. we antagonized a lot of people. we eventually mislaid my job. we was – we pronounce about it in a book.

And we unequivocally suspicion this was something that was function customarily to me. After we left a Times, where we worked for 22 years, we went to a annual assembly of a Hearing Loss Association of America. That year, it was in Washington, and that was a finish explanation to me. There were so many people there, and they were so interesting, and a talks were so interesting, and everybody was going by a same thing we was.

So that’s my initial square of recommendation is get out there. There are other people like you. Acknowledge your detriment and pronounce to other people. My second, we wish to usually supplement this, is to – we need to do something about noise…


BOUTON: …because it’s by distant a largest cause.

FLATOW: We’ll get into that. I’m articulate with Katherine Bouton, author of “Shouting Won’t Help: Why we – and 50 Million Other Americans – Can’t Hear You” on SCIENCE FRIDAY from NPR.

And a pretension of this book, “Shouting Won’t Help,” is symptomatic. People usually roar during you, don’t they?

BOUTON: They presumably roar during we or they gaunt approach in and pronounce unequivocally tighten to your ear. And usually to go behind to speech-reading for a minute, if somebody does that, I’m during a sum loss. we need to see their face to hear them talk. So don’t shout. Don’t gaunt in and whisper.

FLATOW: Mm-hmm. we have prejudiced conference detriment in one of my ears due to a – an examination on radio with a firecracker that went bad. And we – so we have tinnitus in my ear. It’s been toll for over 30 years. So we can – we know, one thing I’m unequivocally unwavering of is a sound around me since we wish to strengthen a good ear, we know? And there is so – and we write about this in your book, how we ceremony noise, basically.

BOUTON: Yes. Mostly in recreational activities. Concerts, stadiums are impossibly loud. The whole brawl about guns and hunting. Nobody ever bothers to discuss a outcome on hearing, yet sport is a vital means of conference loss, customarily usually an ear subsequent to a gun.

But even usually walking down a travel to a studio today, we have an iPhone with a decibel reader on it. And between Times Square and Fifth Avenue, where this bureau is, a decibel scale jumped between 80 and 90 a whole time, that is flattering loud.

FLATOW: Right. Know where we saw one of a misfortune offenders? The lavatory in airplanes, that tiny flush toilet that creates a f-f-f. we took my decibel reader in there. It was over 110.

BOUTON: Wow. we didn’t know that. That’s amazing.


FLATOW: It is so loud. It’s usually amazing. Is there anything to be finished about this or any, we know, do we tell a kids since my kids have those, we know, they have a – their earplugs in, and we can hear it. And we contend if we can hear it, it contingency be too loud.

BOUTON: It is too loud. It’s not – we mean, there’s a lot of opposite systematic opinion on this act of assuage sound over a long, continual period. So even if your kids spin down their headphones, their iPhone – their iPods, if they have them on 12 hours a day, they competence still be deleterious their hearing. If they have them on 12 hours a day and we can hear it, they are deleterious their hearing. So that’s one thing we can do.

But we consider we have a lot of sound ordinances in this country, and solely in a workplace, we don’t make them. It’s – we don’t have to have a headphones on to be unprotected to noise. All we have to do is go out to cooking in a grill or worse, be a waiter in that restaurant. So you’re there all day prolonged with that sound blustering around you.

FLATOW: Talking with Katherine Bouton, author of “Shouting Won’t Help: Why we – and 50 Million Other Americans – Can’t Hear You.” My number, if we can hear me, is 1-800-989-8255. You can also twitter us, @scifri. Stay with us. We’ll be right behind – forgive me – after this break. I’m Ira Flatow, this is SCIENCE FRIDAY from NPR.


FLATOW: This is SCIENCE FRIDAY. I’m Ira Flatow. We’re articulate with Katherine Bouton, author of a book “Shouting Won’t Help: Why we – and 50 Million Other Americans – Can’t Hear You.” It hits a bookshelves subsequent week on Feb 19. Our number, 1-800-989-8255. Let’s pronounce a bit about conference aids since people always pronounce about conference aids. How effective are they? You have – we wear conference aids?

BOUTON: we wear a conference aid.

FLATOW: A conference assist and…

BOUTON: And a cochlear make in a other ear.

FLATOW: Is there a disproportion between a two?

BOUTON: Oh, yes. we could not wear a conference assist in my left ear since my conference is non-existent. we have surpassing conference detriment in my left ear. A cochlear make is surgically implanted. It operates in a totally opposite approach from a conference aid. It takes digital signals that it sends to a brain, and afterwards a mind interprets those digital signals as words. On a other side, I’m conference those same sounds in terms of sound waves that are amplified by my conference aid, and they’re going to a same mind pathways (unintelligible) perplexing to coordinate a dual opposite kinds of signals that are entrance and spin that into debate recognition. What was your…

FLATOW: I’ll ask it. My mom wore conference aids until she was 98, upheld away, and she never, never got used to them. She never suspicion they unequivocally helped her and infrequently she would contend we have to take it out of my ear to hear better. Are conference aids – do they work?

BOUTON: They should work. we don’t know where your mom got hers. But it’s unequivocally critical if you’re wearing conference aids to have them scrupulously fitted. There are – there’s a new kind of conference assist called an open conference assist that does fits unequivocally loosely into your ear and afterwards residence it behind a ear component. The wise in those is not as critical and since there’s – it’s usually not so close, yet cave are full in-the-ear things. Probably not a same distance as your mom wore, yet they do fill adult a ear canal, and if cave were not scrupulously fitted, it would be painful.

And in fact, if we advantage or remove weight, my conference assist fits improved or worse. At one indicate when we got a new conference aid, we had, in between, mislaid about 10 pounds. And they couldn’t use my aged mold. They had to recalibrate a distance of my ear in a figure of a conference aid. So your mom substantially was, and we consider a lot of people, even today, are wearing conference aids that don’t fit and that don’t unequivocally work since they don’t wear them for starters or since they haven’t been scrupulously automatic or since they’re not a right conference aids for that person.

FLATOW: Mm-hmm. When we got your implant, did we – it says in a book that we had to relearn how to hear again. What was that like?

BOUTON: It was very, unequivocally tough for me since we always wore my conference aid. we was still working. we couldn’t means not to hear. we couldn’t means to usually wear my make all a time and not hear out of my other ear. So we didn’t give my make a possibility in a initial 5 or 6 months when – that are a essential months.

But a approach we relearn to hear, we work with a – we worked with a debate pathologist who would go over a sounds that were formidable for me. She would cover her mouth and she would contend am we observant fit, fat or fat, fit? And we couldn’t unequivocally hear a disproportion between fit, fat, fat, fought, any of those things or between bit, bat, but. So we used with her. we used a tiny bit on my mechanism by myself during home. we put headphones on and listened to accessible books and review along with them and afterwards attempted to take my eyes divided and see if we could still follow. It’s – training is not utterly a right tenure for it. You’re unequivocally usually training.

FLATOW: And we also pronounced that we call yourself deaf, yet that’s not politically correct. Please explain that.

BOUTON: Well, deaf with a collateral D refers to a deaf village that is a village with a enlightenment and a language, American Sign Language. Even people who wear conference aids can be members of a deaf village if they select to conclude themselves that way, and if they use American Sign Language as their primary language. we and many other people who have conference detriment usually got sleepy of observant I’m a chairman with conference detriment and so contend I’m sorry, we didn’t hear you, I’m deaf, tiny D.

And it’s unequivocally usually – it’s brief hand. And it’s also a tiny bit – it gives we usually a tiny clarity of delight of being means to contend I’m deaf, we know, pronounce some-more clearly to me. So…

FLATOW: Mm-hmm. 1-800-989-8255 is a number. David from Syracuse, New York. Hi. Welcome to SCIENCE FRIDAY.

DAVID: Hi, Ira. First-time caller. we adore your show. Thanks a lot for holding my call.

FLATOW: You’re welcome.

DAVID: we – when we was about 4 or 5 years old, we grown a mumps and – in my left ear. we wound adult with a 55, 60 percent conference detriment that was diagnosed during a time as what they would call a haughtiness deafness. Now, I’m usually extraordinary – it’s gotten worse over a years. And we usually would like to know from your guest if there have been any advances, they even still use that term, haughtiness deafness, and if there have been any other advances other than a cochlear make that are kind of unresolved out there.

FLATOW: Let me see if we can…

BOUTON: we did hear that.


BOUTON: You’re seeking presumably a tenure haughtiness deafness is still used. It is. It’s a misnomer many of a time. Most conference detriment that people have is sensorineural, that means that your – presumably your sensory, your heard haughtiness or a hair cells in your cochlea are damaged. The customarily time it’s truly, by definition, haughtiness repairs is if it’s a heard nerve. Most of a time it’s a hair cells. But that’s still called sensorineural conference loss, and it’s a kind many people have.

FLATOW: All right. Thank…

DAVID: we consider that – okay. All right. Thanks, Ira. Thank care.

FLATOW: Thank you. You contend that what we consider as haughtiness repairs or hair dungeon repairs unequivocally is not what people unequivocally have.

BOUTON: Oh, they do.

FLATOW: They do.

BOUTON: Yeah. Hair dungeon repairs is a kind of repairs that’s caused by sound exposure. It’s caused by bearing to autotoxins like several drugs. Cisplatin, unfortunately, that is a unequivocally profitable cancer drug, is an autotoxin. Vicodin is an autotoxin. And they all means a same kind of haughtiness damage. They squash your hair cells so that they can’t promulgate scrupulously with a haughtiness that goes to a brain.

FLATOW: Is it probable to re-grow your hair cells? Because each week or so there’s a tiny bit of good news about branch cells or something like that that competence kindle them to re-grow.

BOUTON: In 2010, Stefan Heller, who’s during Stanford University, was a initial to conduct to renovate hair cells in a mammal. Fish and birds renovate their hair cells automatically. A lot of work has been finished on this during a University of Washington, during Stanford, during Harvard and other places, perplexing to figure out since it is that fish and chicks can do it and we can’t. we spent a lot of time during a University of Washington and during Stanford articulate to a several researchers there, and they consider that within a decade they competence have mastered a techniques.

But that doesn’t meant that this is going to be accessible to humans anywhere in a nearby future. It’s usually impossibly formidable work. we consider that nobody wanted to guess how prolonged it would be before this could be practical to humans, yet they were peaceful to contend between 10 and 50 years.



FLATOW: Some things are always 30 years away.



FLATOW: 1-800-989-8255. Talking with Katherine Bouton, author of “Shouting Won’t Help: Why we – and 50 Million Other Americans – Can’t Hear You.” Give us some tips for a scold approach to pronounce to people who can’t hear you.

BOUTON: Well, don’t shout.

FLATOW: Don’t shout. Because no matter how shrill we shout, it’s not going to help.

BOUTON: Don’t gaunt in and pronounce into a person’s ear since as we were deliberating before with debate reading, we need to see a whole face, a body. If you’re in a room with a splendid light source, let a chairman who is conference marred lay with their behind to a light source since differently you’ll be silhouetted and they won’t be means to review your physique language. we have a whole list of suggestions about how to pronounce to people with conference loss, mostly since I’m constantly revelation people how to pronounce to me. They’re in a book. I…

FLATOW: Yeah. One thing we did discuss we suspicion was unequivocally engaging is we can’t prepare and pronounce during a same time.


BOUTON: we adore to cook. I’m a flattering good cook. And we adore to have people over for a holidays. we – final Christmas we had 25 people. And, we know, my friends wish to be helpful, and they come into my kitchen, that is a New York City kitchen, and it’s not unequivocally large anyway. And they wish to pronounce to me while I’m perplexing to juggle about 5 opposite dishes during a same time. And it’s distracting. we make mistakes in my cooking. Sometimes we brief food on myself, blazing food. But we positively can’t hear what a other chairman is saying, and we finally usually say, can we leave? This is – we conclude a thought, yet it’s not helping.

FLATOW: You also tell people – or people tell we – we consider we were observant that your father Dan used to get sleepy of conference we say, what’s that? What’s that?

Can we find something else to contend besides what’s that when we couldn’t hear it?

BOUTON: Yeah. He says – what we would contend is: what? Mostly these days we contend sorry. It seems a tiny bit some-more important. Sorry, can we repeat that? The strange pretension for my book was “Say What?” And we didn’t consider adequate people in America pronounced contend what, yet now we have detected that copiousness do. It also helps. This is another tip, actually. When somebody does contend what or sorry, don’t repeat accurately what we pronounced before. If we can presumably find a approach to paraphrase it, a chairman with conference detriment is many some-more expected to be means to collect it adult a second time around.

FLATOW: Mm-hmm. Let’s go to a phones. Susan in Kansas City, Missouri. Hi, Susan.

SUSAN: Hi. I’m deaf in my left ear and when people pronounce on my left side, we can’t hear a thing. It’s like being totally deaf. And we have a genuine tough time bargain conversations on TV. we don’t know if other people who are privately deaf carrying that problem, yet it’s a genuine problem for me.

FLATOW: Because we are deaf in one hear?

SUSAN: Yes. Sound comes by my conduct and we can’t report it since I’ve never had sound in both ears. But apparently when people are on my left side and they start articulate to me, we don’t hear them during all. If I’m with friends, they know and poke me or answer a doubt or contend demeanour during that person.

FLATOW: Hmm. Katherine, she is observant that she is deaf in one ear and it unequivocally is – even yet she can hear in a other ear, it doesn’t assistance that much.

BOUTON: OK. Yes. No, we can unequivocally describe to that. we was in that position for about 20 years. we always finished a indicate if we presumably could to position myself on a – with a chairman who is articulate to me on my right. we know people pronounce to me on my left side who we had no suspicion they were articulate to me.

And recently – actually, usually yesterday we ran into a male in my building who said, oh, we (unintelligible) your essay in a Times on Tuesday about insanity and conference loss. He pronounced it was so interesting. we had no suspicion we had conference loss. But we do remember one time when we was articulate to we and we didn’t answer me, and we suspicion maybe we had pronounced something offensive. So yeah, it is a problem and we don’t have any suggestions solely usually to try to always position yourself correctly.

FLATOW: I’m Ira Flatow. This is SCIENCE FRIDAY from NPR.

I’m articulate with Katherine Bouton, author of a book “Shouting Won’t Help: Why we – and 50 Million Other Americans – Can’t Hear You.” One would consider that if 50 million Americans have this problem, we’d be some-more wakeful of it or that there competence be some – some-more assistance entrance for these Americans.

BOUTON: we consider that we’re not some-more wakeful of it since there a tarnish compared with conference losses. As we pronounced in your introduction, many people consider that it’s a healthy partial of aging. If you’re removing towards aging, we don’t wish to supplement to a sense that you’re already there by wearing a conference assist or acknowledging your conference loss. So a lot of people do not acknowledge conference loss.

In studies – accounting(ph) conference loss, if we ask if a – if a epidemiologist simply asked someone if they have conference loss, a lot of times they’ll contend no. They competence not be wakeful of it or they competence usually not wish to acknowledge it. The same thing is loyal with conference assist use. If we ask somebody if they use conference aids, like Ira’s mother, they’ll contend yes, yet in fact they’re holding those hearings aids out many of a time since they’re uncomfortable. So they’re not regulating them properly. And this really, unequivocally skews a statistics. It was one of a hardest things in essay my book, was to try to figure out exactly, we know, what series of millions of people in America have conference loss.

FLATOW: Are there any things that are function now that assistance conference people? Any – does record assistance us besides a conference aid?

BOUTON: Well, cochlear implants are wonderful. And even yet I’ve had a tough time with mine, we wouldn’t not wear it for anything. There is a lot of record that’s entrance about and we consider it’s not unequivocally dictated to assistance a conference marred yet it does. For instance, a New York City’s transport complement has commissioned LED lighting and messaging for when a trains are coming, what trains are delayed. I, we know, for 40 years could never hear a thing on a subway. And now all we have to do is review like everybody else.

There’s also – this is (unintelligible) airports, things are visually displayed as good as somebody articulate to that megaphone during we that we can’t hear. And, we know, we consider there – one of a things that we unequivocally wish to do with this book if we can is to lift recognition of how formidable it is for people with conference detriment to get around.

FLATOW: Yeah. Does content messaging help? Unintended consequence?

BOUTON: we adore content messaging. we adore email. we can’t suppose what my life would have been like before content messaging and email. we would have been usually a totally opposite person, and really, we think, totally isolated.

FLATOW: Katherine, appreciate we unequivocally many for holding time to be with us today. It’s so good to see we again.

BOUTON: Thank you.

FLATOW: Katherine Bouton, author of “Shouting Won’t Help: Why we – and 50 Million Other Americans – Can’t Hear You.” Everybody knows someone with a conference problem, everybody will positively advantage from reading Katherine Bouton’s book.

That’s about all a time we have for today. Before we go, we wish to remind we that we are doing a winter photography contest, starts in about 3 minutes. Take some good photos, send it to us during SCIENCE FRIDAY, we’ll put them adult there and decider them and come adult with some winners. It’s a winter deteriorate photography contest.

Copyright © 2013 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from a materials contained herein competence be used in any media but detrimental to NPR. This twin is supposing for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to a Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR’s before permission. Visit a permissions page for serve information.

NPR transcripts are combined on a rush deadline by a executive for NPR, and correctness and accessibility competence vary. This content competence not be in a final form and competence be updated or revised in a future. Please be wakeful that a lawful record of NPR’s programming is a audio.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • LinkedIn
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr