Collection of patient-reported outcomes;


Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have expressed a need for more frequent measurement of relevant outcomes, due to the variations in their symptoms during the day and from day to day. At present, patient-reported outcomes are extensively collected with questionnaires completed with pen and paper.

However, as a measurement tool in frequent data collection the questionnaires are impractical. In contrast, text messages on mobile phones are suitable for frequent data collection.The aim of this study was two-fold; to compare daily registrations of patient-reported outcomes assessed with text-messages on mobile phones (SMS) or with questionnaires completed with pen and paper (PP), with regard to scores and variation of scores, and to examine feasibility of the SMS method in a multicentre clinical study

Methods:
To compare scores, 21 patients with an inflammatory, rheumatic disease performed daily assessments of pain, fatigue, stiffness and ability to carry out daily activities on a numeric rating scale (NRS).

The patients were asked to assess the variables every other day with the SMS method and every other day with the PP method for 28 consecutive days. In total each participant had to answer 14 PP forms and 14 SMS messages.

Mean scores and variation, expressed as the pooled standard deviation or as the average range between the maximum and minimum scores for the two methods, were compared using paired sample t-tests or Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. To examine feasibility, 36 patients with an inflammatory, rheumatic disease assessed the same four variables with SMS twice a week for 35 weeks.

Feasibility of the SMS method was expressed as mean response-rate (%) in the total group and per centre.

Results:
Mean scores, standard deviation of mean scores and mean range scores did not differ significantly between the two methods (p 0.05). Response-rate with the SMS method was 97.9% for the whole group and for the three centres 97.1%, 98.3% and 98.4%, respectively.

Conclusion:
Outcomes assessed on numeric rating scales and reported with text-messages on mobile phones or with questionnaires completed with pen and paper provide comparable scores.

Further, the SMS method provided high response rates (97%) in a multicentre setting. Our results encourage the use of text messages on mobile phones in studies requiring frequent data collection and real-time assessment, as in fluctuating diseases such inflammatory, rheumatic diseases.

Author: Anne ChristieHanne DagfinrudØystein DaleTrenton SchulzKåre Birger Hagen
Credits/Source: BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014, 14:52

Published on: 2014-04-16

Tweet

News Provider: 7thSpace Interactive

Social Bookmarking
RETWEET This! | Digg this! | Post to del.icio.us | Post to Furl | Add to Netscape | Add to Yahoo! | Rojo

There are no comments available. Be the first to write a comment.