Could too most calcium be bad for your heart?



NEW YORK |
Mon Feb 4, 2013 4:16pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – In a new investigate from a National Institutes of Health, group who took calcium tablets were some-more expected to die of heart illness over some-more than a decade than those who didn’t get additional calcium in addition form.

“The outcome of supplemental or dietary calcium on heart illness has always been a bit of an unanswered story,” pronounced Howard Sesso, a surety medicine researcher during Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston.

“It could be that when we take supplements, maybe you’re holding doses that distant surpass what we need,” he added. But it’s still misleading how that competence lift cardiovascular risks.

The new commentary are formed on a investigate of tighten to 400,000 prime Americans instituted in 1995 to 1996.

Study volunteers answered questions about their lifestyle, ubiquitous health and diet, including use of supplements. Researchers afterwards tracked how many of them died, and from what causes, over a subsequent 12 years.

About half of group and some-more than two-thirds of women pronounced they took calcium supplements or multivitamins containing calcium during a outset.

During a investigate period, roughly 12,000 people – or about 3 percent – died of cardiovascular disease.

Qian Xiao from a National Cancer Institute and her colleagues found group who took 1,000 milligrams of calcium per day or some-more were 20 percent some-more expected to die of heart-related causes than those who upheld on calcium supplements. That was after a researchers took into comment men’s age, competition and weight, as good as other measures of diet and lifestyle.

However, there was no couple between calcium supplements and heart illness deaths in women. And calcium from food and beverages wasn’t tied to heart problems in group or women, a investigate group wrote Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine.

It’s probable that calcium rave in a arteries and veins competence impact cardiovascular risks in some people, Xiao wrote in an email to Reuters Health.

NO CAUSE-EFFECT LINK

But Sesso, who wasn’t concerned in a new study, told Reuters Health he wasn’t certain why, biologically, calcium supplements would be associated to a aloft risk of heart problems in group though not women.

The commentary don’t infer a cause-and-effect couple between a supplements and heart problems. It’s probable there were certain differences between group who did or didn’t take additional calcium that a investigate group couldn’t measure.

“Although we celebrated an increasing risk of genocide from heart illness in group who reported holding supplements containing calcium, we can’t contend for certain that it was a outcome of regulating those supplements,” Xiao said.

According to Sesso, a investigate won’t change a fact that calcium supplements are typically endorsed for reasons not associated to heart illness – such as to forestall detonate risk in comparison adults who don’t get adequate calcium by food.

Eating a offset diet and gripping a healthy weight are as or some-more critical than any addition when it comes to cardiovascular health, Sesso said.

“If we have a good diet in a initial place, a addition competence not be adding all that much,” he said.

SOURCE: bit.ly/KEPNSw JAMA Internal Medicine, online Feb 4, 2013.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • LinkedIn
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr