Electronic cigarettes seem to work, psychologically and physically


Since many of my patients have reported regulating electronic cigarettes to successfully stop smoking, we now suggest a inclination to anyone who has attempted to quit smoking cold turkey and failed.  

And we consider it is time that other doctors do, too.

Electronic cigarettes mix a mouthpiece, that contains glass (including nicotine), an atomizer (which heats a glass and turns it into vapor), a battery and an LED tip that glows like a tip of a aflame cigarette.

While early versions of a electronic cigarette date behind to 1963, with a obvious awarded to contriver Herbert Gilbert, a complicated versions of electronic cigarettes—the basement for vast brands in a industry, such as LOGIC and Blu—were introduced during a commencement of this century.

The reason my patients tell me electronic cigarettes work improved than a patch or nicotine resin is that they copy a act of smoking, though not perfectly.  They are good adequate to surrogate for genuine cigarettes, though they aren’t good adequate to turn an addiction, in and of themselves.  An analogy in a locus of food obsession would be something low calorie that fills we adult adequate to forestall bingeing on sweets, gives we some stretch from that addiction, though afterwards becomes forgettable, since it isn’t unequivocally all that compelling.

It is, of course, needed that a electronic cigarette be a good-enough fake.  And, on this count, LOGIC seems to have a slight psychological advantage, given what patients tell me is a really picturesque smoking experience—but not too realistic, as remarkable above.  Interestingly enough, a LOGIC code seems to be a best-selling one in New York City, maybe since of these factors.

There is positively debate about either electronic cigarettes are harmless.  Critics note that they do, of course, enclose nicotine (which is a whole idea, after all).  And critics have also found other substances in a fog expelled by electronic cigarettes—even cancer-causing substances, though in tiny, little amounts that proponents of a inclination explain would have no disastrous outcome on contentment during all.

What no one seems to disagree about is that electronic cigarettes—from LOGIC or Blu or any heading brand—are not scarcely as dangerous as smoking genuine cigarettes.  LOGIC claims a device avoids 4,000 toxins that are found in cigarettes.

Given my practice and those of countless clinicians we have oral with, it would seem to be a good time to control vast scale clinical trials in that patients who fume are given electronic cigarettes by their doctors, speedy to use them and afterwards quizzed on their use of genuine tobacco weeks and months and years later.  If a information generated support a product, afterwards it might be correct for medical word companies to offer electronic cigarettes to smokers for free.  My gamble is they would save lots of money—from a costs of treating heart illness and cancer—down a road.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of a Fox News Medical A-Team. Dr. Ablow can be reached during [email protected].

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • LinkedIn
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr