- Government ‘challenges’ industry to reduce sugar levels by 20% by 2020
- No ban on sweets being placed near checkouts in supermarkets
- Third of children in Britain are considered to be obese
Ben Spencer
and
James Slack for the Daily Mail
329
View
comments
Ministers were accused last night of caving in to the junk food lobby after they abandoned plans to force companies to reduce sugar in children’s food.
The Childhood Obesity Strategy, published today after a year of delays, will instead ‘challenge’ the food industry to cut sugar levels by 20 per cent before 2020.
The Government insisted its actions will slash the number of children and teenagers who are overweight within a decade. But critics said the plan contains nothing that will force companies to act, relying instead on voluntary action and goodwill. One campaign group described it as a ‘shocking abdication’ of the Government’s duties.
The government has been accused of caving in to the junk food lobby after abandoning plans to reduce sugar in food for children
The strategy also ditched plans for an expected ban on junk food TV adverts before the 9pm watershed, and there is no ban on so-called ‘guilt-aisles’, in which shops put sweets at check-outs.
Campaigners had also expected an end to the use of cartoon characters on unhealthy food, and new restrictions on multi-buy deals in supermarkets.
The new policy will ask food manufacturers, retailers and restaurants to come up with ways to cut sugar from biscuits, cakes, sweets, breakfast cereals, yoghurts and ice cream. They will be asked to reduce sugar by 5 per cent in the first year, with a final target of 20 per cent by the end of the decade. But the scheme contains no proposals for concrete rules or laws to compel companies to act.
Sugar tax ‘will cut just five calories’: Soft drinks…
What do Olympians actually eat? Expert reveals how beetroot…
Fat women who refuse to diet ‘are more likely to get…
Nearly a third of children in Britain are overweight, which raises the risk of diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Ministers said they would deal with this by pressing ahead with plans to introduce a tax on sugary drinks in 2018, with the money funding extra PE lessons and healthy breakfast clubs in schools.
The Childhood Obesity Strategy was David Cameron’s attempt to set down firm rules for companies but it was ripped up when Theresa May took over in Downing Street last month.
There is no ban in the guidelines on so-called ‘guilt-aisles’, in which shops put sweets at check-outs
The Childhood Obesity Strategy was David Cameron’s attempt to set down firm rules for companies but it was ripped up when Theresa May took over in Downing Street last month.
NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens has hinted at his unease at the changes, telling the health select committee that a strong ‘enforcement mechanism’ and ‘regulatory backstop’ was needed to make companies comply.
But senior Government sources last night insisted the new strategy had stuck with the most important measures while removing the more ‘tokenistic and nanny state’ proposals.
Insiders said the key to tackling childhood obesity is reducing the amount of sugar in products – which would be achieved by the fizzy drinks tax and the demand for a 20 per cent reduction in sugar in other products popular with children. There were also concerns that banning junk food adverts before 9pm would badly affect TV firms’ revenues.
Unease: Simon Stevens said a strong ‘enforcement mechanism’ was needed to make companies comply
Mrs May is a long-standing opponent of ‘nanny state’ interventions. One source said: ‘What matters is what works. Not banning the Coco Pops monkey, which is really all about tokenism. This is a sensible, common sense approach.’
The Government said its voluntary approach would be reviewed in 2020. If firms have missed the 20 per cent target, ‘alternative levers’ might be used.
But Malcolm Clark, of the Children’s Food Campaign, said: ‘This is a truly shocking abdication of the Government’s duties to secure the health and future of the next generation.’
Tam Fry, of the National Obesity Forum, described the plan as a catastrophe. ‘Food industry barons will be laughing all the way to the bank with government approval to sell junk products to whoever and however they choose,’ he said.
Public health minister Nicola Blackwood said: ‘This Government is absolutely committed to reducing childhood obesity and one of the best ways to do this is to boost sports in schools.’
Share or comment on this article
e-mail
Most watched News videos
Ryan Lochte enters athletes’ village after gunpoint robbery
Well endowed pole vaulter suffers unfortunate Olympic mishap
Shocking racist diatribe by bikini-clad woman caught on camera
Michelle Jenneke does signature warm up routine at Rio Olympics
Is that Big Foot? Dog’s GoPro camera appears to record sasquatch
Strange creature spotted in the desert before disappearing
Michelle Jenneke’s internet sensation warm up dance
911 audio of a neighbor who was attacked by Austin Harrouff
Woman confronts man who is ‘rubbing’ himself on the subway
Olympics: Dutchman face plants floor during gymnastics final
Watch incredible moment Shaunae Miller dives to win gold
Olympic belly flop from Malaysian diver Ahmad Amsyar Azman
What robbery? Brazilian police say Ryan Lochte’s wallet was…
How one US college has won nearly as many medals as Brazil!…
Is zombie drug Flakka behind cannibal frat boy attack?…
Brady Bunch actress Eve Plumb sells the $3.9m Malibu home…
Mother and boyfriend are arrested after girl, four, who was…
Is this the saddest gold medallist at the Games? North…
EXCLUSIVE: Shaken Ryan Lochte seen in new security footage…
‘You should have stayed in Africa’: Ranting mum launches…
Three US swimmers held by police at Rio airport over Ryan…
The only time a man wishes he had a SMALLER penis! Japanese…
The rise and rise of Johnny Manziel’s sister: As disgraced…
‘This is unlike any ransom note I’ve ever seen’: Original…
Comments (334)
Share what you think
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
The comments below have not been moderated.
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Find out now