Live-in lovers have half of all abortions due to financial pressure on young couples who can’t afford to raise children


  • Number of abortions performed on cohabitees has trebled in a decade
  • Money worries and the fear that their partner could leave contribute to the woman’s decision
  • Total number of abortions in England and Wales has fallen in the last year

By
Steve Doughty, Social Affairs Correspondent

17:30 EST, 11 July 2013

|

18:06 EST, 11 July 2013

Growing numbers of unmarried women in their 20s and 30s who live with their partners do not feel financially secure to have a baby

Growing numbers of unmarried women in their 20s and 30s who live with their partners do not feel financially secure to have a baby

Half of all abortions are now carried out on unmarried women who are living with a partner, official figures revealed yesterday.

The share of terminations performed on cohabitees has trebled in a decade.

Last year cohabiting women had 86,764 abortions – 50 per cent of all abortions among women who were willing to give details of their relationships.

There were almost two abortions performed on cohabitees for every one undergone by a lone single woman, and three for every one for a married woman.

The fast rise in abortion among women in live-in relationships appears partly to result from financial pressure on couples in their 20s and 30s during the recession, who find themselves expecting a baby but can’t afford one.

Another factor could be women in co-habiting relationships fearing they could end up being left to bring up a baby on their own if their partner leaves them.

The figures may also in part reflect a willingness on the part of women to be open about their living arrangements, when in the past cohabitees having abortions would be more reluctant to admit they had a partner.

The number of women living in cohabiting relationships has doubled since 1996, according to estimates by the Office for National Statistics.

Around 1.5million women were cohabiting in the mid-1990s. This rose to two million by 2000, 2.5million in 2006, and just under three million now.

This landmark in the use of abortion comes at a time when research suggests a typical cohabitation lasts for just three years before it breaks up or the couple marry.

Research shows that the number of live-in relationships last three years before the couple either break up or marry

Research shows that the number of live-in relationships last three years before the couple either break up or marry

By contrast the average divorce comes after 11 years of marriage and an average marriage lasts for 32 years.

In 2002 only 17 per cent of women who had an abortion in England and Wales said they had a partner but were unmarried.

This
went up to 31 per cent in 2005 and then to 42 per cent in 2007 and 2008
as the recession began to bite. The proportion of cohabitees who had
terminations was 49 per cent in 2011, and hit the 50 per cent benchmark
last year.

Overall the
number of abortions in England and Wales dropped slightly in 2012 to
185,122, compared with 189,931 the previous year.

The total number of abortions in England and Wales has dropped in the last year

The total number of abortions in England and Wales has dropped in the last year

Alongside
the 86,764 performed on unmarried women with partners, 44,923 were
performed on  lone single women, 28,828 on married women, and 10,387 on
unmarried women who would not describe their relationships.

Alarmingly, the figures found there were 89 girls under 16 who had a second abortion, including one who went through her fourth termination.

The only age group among whom abortion numbers rose was women between 30 and 34, up from 29,579 in 2011 to 30,353 last year.

Pro-marriage pressure groups blamed the insecurity of cohabitation for pushing women towards abortion.

Harry Benson, of the Marriage Foundation, said: ‘This is what happens when large numbers of couples move in together and become trapped in unhappy cohabiting relationships.

‘The commitment of a couple who decide to marry and build a future is similar to the commitment involved in planning a baby. Cohabiting couples rarely have that commitment.’

A spokesman for the Department of Health said: ‘We are pleased to see that the number of abortions is falling but we know that more needs to be done. Abortions can be traumatic and stressful and should never be seen as a form of contraception.’

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

There’s this thing called birth control, you know!

Boosmum
,

Merseyside,
12/7/2013 02:40

25 1/2yrs together married for the last 8. Four children 22,20,1714. How do they know that the information these ladies give is right, proberbly sounds better to them to say they are living with someone than to say they are single. What is really bad is young girls having had one or more, why are not on the pill or injection, why are the parents not sorting them out. My eldest daughter is now 20 when she was 14 I took her to doctors to see about going on pill due to periods were very heavy and irregular, doctors did agree after discussion with us both my husband did not agree with us because he thought it sound bad to be on the pill at her age. When I was pregnant with my first child I had some blood test that showed baby could have spinabifida it is also in the family, I was 17 at so they said I should have termination, I refused as there where still a few results to come back, they were all clear so was scan, my son was born healthy a few wk early but he’s 23 in a few months.

Tj
,

Tamworth,
12/7/2013 02:30

Then they should be responsible enough to use appropriate contraception. There is simply no excuse these days.

Reubenene
,

Victoria, Australia,
12/7/2013 02:22

I have to agree with the pro marriage components here, without an institution that provides some kind of legal bond keeping you together which a marriage is then nobody can be sure that if the pressure gets to much if their partner will be here today gone tomorrow leaving them with the financial burden of raising the child alone so naturally if they get pregnant they are less likely to want to have the child and abortion then gives them the easy way out they want.

Brett
,

Somewhere in England I think,
12/7/2013 02:08

Live in lovers? What an awful term to use! Nothing wrong with cohabiting, got to try before you buy!

Charli
,

Cardiff,
12/7/2013 01:48

What’s wrong with getting married first before living together?

Nat9898
,

Melbourne, Australia,
12/7/2013 01:47

Try condoms.

Les
,

Perth, Australia,
12/7/2013 01:40

Condoms are not very expensive and would save all these abortions from being needed. Don’t people THINK today before jumping into bed?

Sleuth
,

East of Eden, United Kingdom,
12/7/2013 01:37

Cannot understand the Pro-marriage Pressure Group’s logic, seems to be jumping to a lot of conclusions.”This is what happens when large numbers of couples move in together and become trapped in unhappy cohabiting relationships.” Sorry but I can’t see how they’re trapped? If they were married they would then feel trapped and more pressured to have the child regardless of the situation. Nobody can know any couples situation fully, so no point just guessing.

Also I can’t believe the one girl under 16 who had 4 abortions. Have they not tried to get her to have/use some form of contraception? That’s terrible.

Lalala7
,

West Midlands, United Kingdom,
12/7/2013 01:25

One would imagine these abortions were not decided on a whim which this article is kind of implying here! Seems to me it’s a dig at women … AGAIN!

Minnie the Minx
,

UK,
12/7/2013 00:58

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.