Nanny-state alcohol ad bans ‘don’t work’, analysis finds

In 2022, the World Health Organisation (WHO) called for tighter restrictions on the marketing of alcohol, including advertising, sponsorship and promotions, in a bid to reduce harmful uses, particularly among young people. But the report by the IEA said that studies suggest advertising 'does not increase aggregate sales of the type of product being advertised'

A ‘nanny-state’ ban on alcohol advertising would have little or no impact on consumption, a review of evidence has found.

The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) examined studies that looked at how marketing alcohol affected demand.

While advertising could increase the popularity of individual brands, it did not increase sales of similar products overall.

Instead, people simply switched what they bought rather than drinking more, the think tank said.

In 2022, the World Health Organisation (WHO) called for tighter restrictions on the marketing of alcohol, including advertising, sponsorship and promotions, in a bid to reduce harmful uses, particularly among young people. But the report by the IEA said that studies suggest advertising ‘does not increase aggregate sales of the type of product being advertised’

Data from a 2022 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report found Brits drank 9.7 litres of pure alcohol per adult in 2020 — 0.1 less than the EU average.

So how much is TOO much?

NHS recommendations state adults shouldn’t drink more than 14 units each week.

That’s 14 single shots of spirit or six pints of beer or a bottle and a half of wine.

They should also spread their drinking over three or more days to avoid bingeing.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advises Americans do not drink more than 14 standard alcohol drinks per week for men and seven for women.

A standard alcoholic drink includes 12oz of 5 per cent beer, 8oz of 7 per cent malt liqour, 5oz of 12 per cent wine or 1.5oz of spirits including rum, gin, vodka or whiskey.

Drinking excessive amounts of alcohol over many years is already linked to a plethora of health issues such as high blood pressure, stroke risk, and range of cancers.

In its Alcohol Advertising: What does the evidence show? report, the IEA suggested these calls were not backed by the evidence.

The report said that studies suggest advertising ‘does not increase aggregate sales of the type of product being advertised.

‘A small number of studies looking specifically at the impact of alcohol advertising bans have produced mixed results, but the majority have found no impact on aggregate sales.’

It continues: ‘For some public health and temperance campaigners, the mere existence of advertising is proof that it leads to greater consumption.

‘They often say of alcohol advertising: ‘If it doesn’t work, why would the industry spend so much money on it?’.

‘Their mistake is to see the alcohol industry as a monolithic entity rather than a group of rival businesses.

‘The alcohol industry does not advertise. Alcohol companies advertise, and it is worth their while to spend money attracting other companies’ customers and keeping hold of their own.’

Last year, the Scottish Government launched a consultation on the potential ban on alcohol advertising.

But First Minister Humza Yousaf has since paused any plans to bring restrictions into action amid concern from industry.

In 2021, alcohol advertising was banned in sports in Ireland as part of its Public Health (Alcohol) Act.

Christopher Snowdon, head of lifestyle economics at the IEA and author of the report, said: ‘The claim that banning alcohol advertising would reduce the amount of alcohol-related harm in society has remarkably little evidence to support it.

‘Advertising affects the market share of individual brands, but the amount of money spent on alcohol advertising has no effect on alcohol consumption overall.

‘This is how advertising works in every other mature market, and it would be a surprise if alcohol were any different.’

He said any ban on the advertising of alcohol would not be an evidence-based policy, adding: ‘Strident claims from anti-alcohol campaigners about advertising should be taken with a pinch of salt.

‘This evidence review found that only a few high-quality studies have looked at this issue, and the evidence is, at best, mixed.’

DO YOU DRINK TOO MUCH ALCOHOL? THE 10 QUESTIONS THAT REVEAL YOUR RISK

One screening tool used widely by medical professionals is the AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Tests). Developed in collaboration with the World Health Organisation, the 10-question test is considered to be the gold standard in helping to determine if someone has alcohol abuse problems.

The test has been reproduced here with permission from the WHO.

To complete it, answer each question and note down the corresponding score.

YOUR SCORE:

0-7: You are within the sensible drinking range and have a low risk of alcohol-related problems.

Over 8: Indicate harmful or hazardous drinking.

8-15: Medium level of risk. Drinking at your current level puts you at risk of developing problems with your health and life in general, such as work and relationships. Consider cutting down (see below for tips).

16-19: Higher risk of complications from alcohol. Cutting back on your own may be difficult at this level, as you may be dependent, so you may need professional help from your GP and/or a counsellor.

20 and over: Possible dependence. Your drinking is already causing you problems, and you could very well be dependent. You should definitely consider stopping gradually or at least reduce your drinking. You should seek professional help to ascertain the level of your dependence and the safest way to withdraw from alcohol.

Severe dependence may need medically assisted withdrawal, or detox, in a hospital or a specialist clinic. This is due to the likelihood of severe alcohol withdrawal symptoms in the first 48 hours needing specialist treatment.