Organizing tellurian citation collections: Getting a best out of biobanks


Jan. 24, 2013 ? The farrago of biobanks, collections of tellurian specimens from a accumulation of sources, raises questions about a best approach to conduct and oversee them, finds a investigate published in BioMed Central’s open entrance biography Genome Medicine. The investigate highlights problems in standardizing these collections and how to make these samples accessible for research.

Biobanks have been around for decades, storing hundreds of millions of tellurian specimens. But there has been a thespian boost in a series of biobanks in a final 10 years, given a tellurian genome sequencing project. Because there is no executive registry of biobanks in a US, researchers from a University of North Carolina during Chapel Hill invited over 600 biobanks to attend in an online survey.

The investigate finds good farrago in when and because these biobanks were created, how they are organized, who pays for them, and what specimens they store. Over half were set adult to promote investigate into a sold disease, especially cancer, though others were combined as a ‘home’ for comparison representation collections. The series of samples within any biobank is hugely variable, from tens to millions, and can embody clinical, pediatric or autopsy samples, or specimens from research, with origins as sundry as blood and plain tissues, or hair and toe nails.

Talking about attempts to put into place policies to umpire biobanks, Prof Gail Henderson, who led this plan explained, “Biobanks are partial of an rising and fast elaborating industry, with an increasingly executive purpose in biomedical research. Because they have grown in opposite contexts with opposite goals and appropriation sources, any try to control or order biobanks will need to take into comment their organizational farrago and their particular practices and challenges. It is doubtful that a one-size process will fit all.”

Other amicable bookmarking and pity tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials supposing by BioMed Central.

Note: Materials might be edited for calm and length. For serve information, greatfully hit a source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Gail E Henderson, R JEAN Cadigan, Teresa P Edwards, Ian Conlon, Anders G Nelson, James P Evans, Arlene M Davis, Cathrine Zimmer, Bryan J Weiner. Characterizing biobank organizations in a U.S.: formula from a inhabitant survey. Genome Medicine, 2013; 5 (1): 3 DOI: 10.1186/gm407

Note: If no author is given, a source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This essay is not dictated to yield medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views voiced here do not indispensably simulate those of ScienceDaily or the staff.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • LinkedIn
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr