The GypsyNesters: Why Do We Take So Many Drugs?


I like to flip by a channels when examination a dusk news. The other night while practicing my ride aerobics, we beheld that a accurate same blurb was on dual of a networks during a accurate same time. That astounded me a bit.

What didn’t startle me was that it was an ad for a remedy drug.

So we motionless to start profitable attention. It seemed that during slightest half of a advertisements were for pharmaceuticals.

I also beheld that we contingency have during slightest half a dozen things severely wrong with me and should be heavily medicated. If we could usually learn to omit a fact that we feel fine, we competence have some wish for recovery.

No, seriously, we are being incited into a republic of highly-strung hypochondriacs. From what we can, tell those of us who watch a dusk news are really, unequivocally sick. We need lots of drugs for a blood pressure, erectile dysfunction, depression, asthma, some-more erectile dysfunction, hair loss, blood clots, Alzheimer’s, ongoing opposed pulmonary disease, nonetheless some-more erectile dysfunction, fibromyalgia, arthritis, bladder control, lengthened prostate, a dreaded ongoing dry eye, even some-more erectile dysfunction and misfortune of all — a singular many terrible flay of a complicated lives — brief eyelashes. Good thing some association spent years of investigate and contrast to rise a heal for that!

Yes, we noticed advertisements for cures to all of these ailments in a matter of days.

I remember behind when Walter Cronkite and Huntley-Brinkley didn’t peddle drugs. we always suspicion it was since it was illegal, though it wasn’t.

Because a FDA compulsory full avowal of all of a drug’s effects to be enclosed in advertising, imitation was a usually viable middle for all of that information. The curative companies pitched their products in veteran journals and magazines, focusing their campaigns toward doctors.

In a 1980s, income began to upsurge from a drug manufacturers into direct-to-consumer advertising. Originally this was applauded by consumer advocates as a proceed for some-more information to strech patients, though afterwards in 1997, a FDA loose a avowal manners for ads. Instead of requiring all sum to be disclosed in an ad, now usually what a FDA deemed as “serious” or “common” side effects had to be disclosed in a promote advertisement, a sum could be done accessible elsewhere. This brought about a “See a ad in Horse and Hound Magazine for some-more information” disclosures.

Still, a ads sounded kind of bad with all of those nasty side effects included, so a drug makers used a loophole. Reminder ads use elementary name approval by repeating a code name over and over again. A common tactic was a “Ask your alloy if this drug is right for you” approach. As prolonged as a blurb never settled what a drug was for, those annoying side effects need not be revealed. The curative companies used them with a vengeance.

I suspect a speculation was that people wish what they see on TV, even if they have positively no thought what it is.

Once a names of a drugs were amply beaten into a brains, a companies began divulgence a sinister consequences of immoderate their products. We’ve now been totally desensitized to a indicate that ads customarily discuss “possible death” and “sometimes deadly events” as a side effect; we Americans continue to rush out and ask a doctors to give us these pills regardless.

Are a curative companies no longer endangered about a public’s hatred to terrible side effects? These fast-talking washing lists of a gloomy things that competence occur if we devour their products should put us off — though we continue to consume. Even when a heal is worse than a disease, Americans seem assured that we need some-more and some-more pills.

I trust an opinion of “it contingency be good if it’s clever adequate to kill me” has developed. Personally, I’m not wasting any of my hard-earned income on a ongoing dry eye refreshment that can’t during slightest put me in a coma.

The finish outcome of this? Americans are now by distant a many medicated people on a planet. Around 130 million folks take a remedy drug any month. More than 125,000 Americans die annually from remedy drug greeting and mistakes any year, representing a nation’s onward heading killer. That’s 3 times a series that die in automobile accidents.

Are a ads behind this? Pharmaceutical manufacturers do spend a startling amount some-more on offered than research.

“We are holding proceed too many drugs for indeterminate or farfetched ailments. What a drug companies are doing now is compelling drugs for long-term use to radically healthy people.”

I didn’t make that up, Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor of a New England Journal of Medicine, pronounced it.

A Sep 2010 news from a Center for Disease Control reveals some shocking statistics. In a month before to a survey, during slightest one remedy drug was taken by:

  • 48 percent of Americans
  • One of any 5 American children
  • 9 out of 10 comparison Americans
  • 88.4 percent of Americans age 60 and over used during slightest one remedy drug, some-more than 76 percent used dual or some-more in a past month and 37 percent used 5 or more
  • In 2008, $234.1 billion was spent in a United States on remedy drugs — some-more than double what was spent in 1999 

How could we presumably need all of these drugs? Are we that most sicker than we were a integrate decades ago?

Wait, maybe holding all of these pills creates us some-more healthy. Not by a prolonged shot. Chronic diseases are proceed up. All a improved to sell some-more pills, to a balance of some-more than 4 billion prescriptions created in 2011 alone.

America is scarcely alone in this insanity. New Zealand is a usually other nation on a world that allows this direct-to-consumer promotion of drugs.

A side outcome of direct-to-consumer promotion is a financial inducement to a curative attention to marketplace new drugs as remedies for all sorts of maladies, including ones they were never dictated to treat. They are literally offered a side effects now. For example, a drug Latisse — primarily tested to provide glaucoma — is now being marketed to urge eyelash growth. To mystify a conditions more, there are side effects to a side outcome that is Latisse.

A while behind we done adult a dreaded Periodic Interrupted Sleep Syndrome (P.I.S.S.) in a spiteful bid to indicate out a stupidity of a syndrome multitude that we have become. Now, we severely design to see an ad for a new drug to provide it any day. I’ll be flipping by a channels (which I’ve detected means we have adult ADD and need evident medication) and there it will be.

On dual channels during once… right after a news story about a new drug.

David, GypsyNester.com

YOUR TURN: You’ve listened what I’ve had to say. What’s your take?


Follow The GypsyNesters on Twitter:

www.twitter.com/gypsynester

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
  • Google Reader
  • LinkedIn
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr
  • Tumblr